These days, there is an ongoing debate among parents about the behaviour of children. While is it possible to claim that parents are responsible for children’s behaviour; however, some parents believe the opposite. Thus, in this essay, I shall explain both sides of the argument followed by a rational conclusion.
At the outset, there are many reasons why parents take responsibility for their children’s behaviour. One of them is that they played a major part in raising their children, but there are some instances where the children are raised by their grandparents. Furthermore, it should also need to take into account that upbringing a child cannot be done single-handedly. With respect to leading research conducted at Harvard University, it is revealed parents have more obligation on the upbringing of their children. Yet, many parents believe responsibility should divide equally.
Nevertheless, those who disagree with the argument, believe it is children’s duty to differentiate between right and wrong. According to an academic journal which focuses on parenting, it is shown that children need to be responsible for their own action after some point in their life. As per the research, neither students nor parents seem to have agreed with its discovery. Therefore, it is advisable parents to engage themselves in the upbringing of their children, or else it would be unfortunate if their children contribute to increasing the crime rate.
While there are strong arguments to support both sides of the case, but my opinion is that parents need to take full responsibility for the behaviour of their children. I would strongly suggest potential parents plan ahead because raising a child properly requires heaps of help and patience.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 185, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... for children's behaviour; however, some parents believe the opposite. Thus,...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, while, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.5418719212 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 20.9802955665 148% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1497.0 1207.87684729 124% => OK
No of words: 277.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40433212996 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09379752152 2.71678728327 114% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570397111913 0.580463131201 98% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 379.143842365 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.6157635468 173% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.791754217 50.4703680194 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.928571429 104.977214359 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7857142857 20.9669160288 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.71428571429 7.25397266985 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247800049701 0.242375264174 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0988386052188 0.0925447433944 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0670219541902 0.071462118173 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170062523221 0.151781067708 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0166290060419 0.0609392437508 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 12.6369458128 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.1260098522 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 11.5310837438 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.32886699507 102% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 55.0591133005 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.