Parents should be held legally responsible for children’s act. What is your opinion?
A child's action speaks of parents teachings. Some people think that parents should be held legally responsible for their children's act, while others maintain the other way around. This essay will discuss that why parents should be held accountable for their children’s act and subsequently lead to a logical conclusion.
Firstly, there are myriad of arguments in favour of holding parents accountable for their children's act. To begin with, parents are the best teachers and can preach the best of ethical values and inculcate good moral values in their children. Therefore, the proportion of attention given to the child is manifested through his good or bad actions and consequently depicts the level of involvement and fulfillment of responsibility by parents. Hence, owing to the primary role that parents have to perform, they must be held responsible for their children's act.
Nevertheless, children are more attached with their parents. Therefore, it is the prime responsibility of parents to guide their off springs to tread on the right path. As an example, law of California act 1990 clearly specifies parents to be accountable for their children's act. Furthermore, many developed countries have also passed the laws for holding parents accountable for their children's act. As a matter of fact, grooming of children is solely the responsibility of parents and those failing to do so are to be held accountable.
In conclusion, parents being best the teachers and closest to their children need to teach high moral values to refrain their kids from bad actions. However, I opine that role of parents is the most crucial in the grooming of their kids and they should be held accountable for their off springs actions.
- Some people think that human history has been a journey from ignorance to knowledge Others argue that this underestimates the achievements of ancient cultures and overvalues our achievements Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 80
- People emphasizing government to build an advanced transport system rather new road for vehicles that are overcrowding the cities. Do you agree or disagree? 85
- The claim that animals have "rights" has been subject to much of a debate since 1970. Are zoos helping or hurting animals? Should zoos be banned? Do you agree or disagree? 75
- Do you think consumers should avoid over packaged products or is it the responsibility of producers? 77
- Today's youngsters are more expected to help others than those in the past. Do you agree or disagree? 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 313, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s act and subsequently lead to a logical conclusion. Firstly, there are myria...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, as a matter of fact, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1462.0 1207.87684729 121% => OK
No of words: 280.0 242.827586207 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22142857143 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90305961049 2.71678728327 107% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.510714285714 0.580463131201 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 420.3 379.143842365 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1959099134 50.4703680194 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.428571429 104.977214359 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.9669160288 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.25397266985 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 2.91625615764 206% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.425065046803 0.242375264174 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.181784202193 0.0925447433944 196% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111887018668 0.071462118173 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.309283599392 0.151781067708 204% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105714158305 0.0609392437508 173% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 12.6369458128 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.1260098522 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.9458128079 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 11.5310837438 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.32886699507 97% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 55.0591133005 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 63.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.