parents should be legally responsible for their child's acts
The importance of parents should legally responsible for their children’s acts which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while others reject this notion. The substantial influence of this trend has sparked the controversy over the potential impact in recent years. In my opinion, the former proposition appears to be more rational. This essay will further elaborate both positive and negative effects of this trend and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
There are myriad of reasons which will further explain this arguments but one of the most preponderant one stems from the fact that parents should be legally responsible for their children’s acts because parents can support for children of any situation so parents can be carefully for their children’s. Another pivotal aspect of this argument is that parents should be good guide for their child’s parents can be aware for child so child’s future will be very well. Needless to say, all these merits stand in a good stead.
However, there are some pitfalls that negate these arguments and which can certainly overwhelm the potential influence of this trend but one of the most alarming one is that parents can be supported for their children so parents should be held legally responsible for their child’s acts. Besides, parents should take good actions for their child’s they can child successful in future. Hence, it is apparent why are against this trend.
According to the arguments aforementioned above, one can reach to a conclusion that the benefits of parents should legally responsible for their child’s acts are instrumental indeed. Nevertheless, its potential drawbacks should not be overlooked either.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-06-09 | asali | 88 | view |
| 2020-11-28 | kalyan_u | 76 | view |
| 2020-07-20 | Gohar Khan | 72 | view |
| 2020-06-09 | Janabakhshi | 94 | view |
| 2020-06-09 | Janabakhshi | 90 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 56, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...d of reasons which will further explain this arguments but one of the most preponder...
^^^^
Line 5, column 385, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
... child's they can child successful in future. Hence, it is apparent why are against ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, hence, however, look, nevertheless, so, thus, well, while, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.5418719212 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 6.10837438424 295% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 20.9802955665 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 31.9359605911 75% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1513.0 1207.87684729 125% => OK
No of words: 278.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44244604317 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96543629708 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 139.433497537 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.510791366906 0.580463131201 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 449.1 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 87.1733187392 50.4703680194 173% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.083333333 104.977214359 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1666666667 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 7.25397266985 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.510624063052 0.242375264174 211% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.197562152308 0.0925447433944 213% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.173630043606 0.071462118173 243% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.379645292011 0.151781067708 250% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113887471008 0.0609392437508 187% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 12.6369458128 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.1260098522 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 11.5310837438 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.32886699507 105% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 55.0591133005 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 67.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.