It is irrefutable and undeniable that people are moving to cities for jobs and a better lifestyle. To avoid the vehicles that are overcrowding in the cities, some people opine that building new roads would mitigate the problem, while others maintain that an advanced transport system should be in place. This essay will discuss why an advanced transport system would be of an advantage in comparison to building new roads.
Firstly, public transport paves the way for the advanced transport system. If public transport provides reliability and punctuality in its services, people would try not to use their private vehicles. For instance, the Singapore public transport system is very efficient and people predominantly use it to save money and reach faster. Also, the traffic on the roads would be significantly reduced as people start using public transport.
Pollution is a major problem in cities and the emissions from the vehicles have been a major contributor to detrimental air quality. Although people think that building a new road would reduce the traffic in the city, they are not aware of the environmental impact of the gases that vehicles release. A longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists clearly indicates that private transport has contributed greatly to air pollution. This clearly indicates that the government must focus on building an advanced transport system rather than constructing new roads.
This essay discussed various reasons why public transport should be promoted instead of building new roads. In my opinion, people should emphasize the government in building an advanced transport system rather than constructing new roads.
- traditional learning vs experiential learning 55
- In a cashless society people use more credit cards What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon 83
- People emphasizing government to build an advanced transport system rather new road for vehicles that are overcrowding the cities. Do you agree or disagree? 70
- It is important for school children to study music, art, and sports as it is for them to become literate and numerate. How far do you agree with this statement? Support your point of view with reasons and/or examples from your own experience. 70
- Some people think that universities should not provide so much theoretical but give more practical training throughout their courses 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, so, while, for instance, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 31.9359605911 72% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1419.0 1207.87684729 117% => OK
No of words: 260.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45769230769 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83180112881 2.71678728327 104% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 139.433497537 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.507692307692 0.580463131201 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 428.4 379.143842365 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.9867312699 50.4703680194 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.153846154 104.977214359 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.9669160288 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.30769230769 7.25397266985 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.448048153272 0.242375264174 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.172771285017 0.0925447433944 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118256968258 0.071462118173 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.288990233557 0.151781067708 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0692769853228 0.0609392437508 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 12.6369458128 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.1260098522 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 11.5310837438 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.32886699507 107% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 55.0591133005 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 63.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.