people emphasizing government to build an advanced transport system rather new roads for vehicles that are overcrowding the cities. Do you agree or disagree?
Advanced transport plays a pivotal role for communication between the two part of the city hence people should support the government initiative for this elixir steps to improve infrastructure to relax the traffic problem in cities. This essay will be elaborate the positive implication of next generation transport system and demerits of new roads construction for vehicle.
To embark with, the Next generation transport system is the deciding factor for any future city and government should identify myriad approach to enhance the transport system by turning every stone. This next generation will not only reduce the ongoing traffic condition of the urban area but also overcome the pollution problem of cities. For example, allowing underground metro construction or waterway path are the perfect scheme to build effective transport system for cities. This will help people to communicate longer distance in short time and support to relocate in suburbs results reducing overcrowding of cities.
On the flip side, constructing new roads in cities for new vehicle will result in more number of vehicle addition in the cities which is detrimental sign for urban areas which is proportionally impacting environment. This ideas is not a long term solution for people requirement and government has to think a new way to enhance traffic problem.
To conclude this, people should support and emphasize the government steps to build advance transport system for cities which outweigh the new road construction for vehicle.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 344, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'roads'' or 'road's'?
Suggestion: roads'; road's
...on transport system and demerits of new roads construction for vehicle. To embark ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 218, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: These
...s proportionally impacting environment. This ideas is not a long term solution for p...
^^^^
Line 5, column 229, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[4]
Message: You should probably use: 'are'.
Suggestion: are
...nally impacting environment. This ideas is not a long term solution for people req...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, as to, for example, in short
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.5418719212 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 6.0 20.9802955665 29% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 5.75862068966 382% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1295.0 1207.87684729 107% => OK
No of words: 237.0 242.827586207 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4641350211 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83372838451 2.71678728327 104% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 139.433497537 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535864978903 0.580463131201 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 396.9 379.143842365 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6551724138 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 36.4813498776 50.4703680194 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.888888889 104.977214359 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3333333333 20.9669160288 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.25397266985 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.356929783965 0.242375264174 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.16462289801 0.0925447433944 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.085192971423 0.071462118173 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.258524513372 0.151781067708 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0626337740054 0.0609392437508 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 12.6369458128 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 53.1260098522 69% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 11.5310837438 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.32886699507 116% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 55.0591133005 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.