people emphasizing government to build an advanced transport system rather new roads for vehicles that are overcrowding the cities. Do you agree or disagree?

Essay topics:

people emphasizing government to build an advanced transport system rather new roads for vehicles that are overcrowding the cities. Do you agree or disagree?

Recently, the phenomenon of the government role in overcrowded cities and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of advanced transport system can be highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that better roads and highways can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.

From a social standpoint, improving public transportation can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of transports systems, as well as new roads for vehicles, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered how governmental decisions can result in overcrowding the cities. Thus, beneficial ramifications of public transport systems and improving highways apparently can be seen.

Within the realm of overcrowded cities, emphasizing governments to improve public transport might increase the consequences of all the means of transportation. Moreover, fundamental aspects of new roads could relate to this reality that the demerits of vehicles pertain rush hours. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of a city trip is correlated negatively with overcrowded cities. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of public transportation.

To conclude, while there are some compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of advanced transport systems far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of new roads prove the significance of overpopulated cities, but also pinpoint possible implications.

Votes
Average: 7.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-10-31 Anahitahs 85 view
2019-03-23 Ehsan.bagherieh 77 view
2019-01-05 Daniel Torres 11 view
2018-10-16 mahdi_amanipour 77 view
2018-08-10 sunilkms 72 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user Ehsan.bagherieh :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1562.0 1207.87684729 129% => OK
No of words: 274.0 242.827586207 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.70072992701 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.34094536399 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 139.433497537 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631386861314 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 379.143842365 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5905825711 50.4703680194 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.166666667 104.977214359 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8333333333 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280363105329 0.242375264174 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0867980339956 0.0925447433944 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0455273196939 0.071462118173 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155159635196 0.151781067708 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0272802480569 0.0609392437508 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 12.6369458128 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.08 11.5310837438 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.49 8.32886699507 126% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 55.0591133005 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.