People pursue dangerous activities like skydiving, motorcycle sports, water river rafting etc. Do you support? if yes why and if not why not?
One of the most conspicuous trends of today's world is a colossal upsurge in the number of individuals who are engage in dangerous sports. There is a widespread worry that this will only lead to a myriad of concerns. In my opinion, this apprehension is unwarranted and should be rejected.
There are number of arguments in favour of my stance but most preponderant one is that dangerous activities can lead to a serious injury which can change individual career. In fact, not only does such activity provide pleasure but it also gives refreshment. We can find overwhelming evidence in support of the fact that there is a positive correlation between adventurous sport and peace of mind. Needless to say, all the merits stand people in a good stead as far as creativity is concerned.
Another pivotal aspect of the arguments is that it provides relaxation to the body which creates positive vibe. Besides, it can also help to move forward to the better life and opportunities. For example, people can be free from stress if they do the adventurous activities. Hence, it is apparent that many are in favour of dangerous activities like skydiving, motorcycle sports, water-river rafting.
In view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that the benefits of such activities are indeed too great to ignore.
- The importance of car and aeroplane in modern life. Give examples. 72
- Some people think law changes human behavior. Do you agree or disagree? 55
- Nowadays TV has become an essential part of life. Medium to spread news & awareness and for some, it acts as a companion. What is your opinion about this? 55
- Some people believe that the sole aim of higher education is to make people ready for employment. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Discuss. 80
- Should Age discrimination against older workers be made illegal? 55
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 103, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...al upsurge in the number of individuals who are engage in dangerous sports. There is a ...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 111, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'engaged'.
Suggestion: engaged
...ge in the number of individuals who are engage in dangerous sports. There is a widespr...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, if, so, for example, in fact, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1097.0 1207.87684729 91% => OK
No of words: 220.0 242.827586207 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98636363636 5.00649968141 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91270726925 2.71678728327 107% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 139.433497537 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.590909090909 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 354.6 379.143842365 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.3464943976 50.4703680194 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.4166666667 104.977214359 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 20.9669160288 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.83333333333 7.25397266985 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161232522825 0.242375264174 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0547672564619 0.0925447433944 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0881481200578 0.071462118173 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0876583358506 0.151781067708 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0676342601759 0.0609392437508 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 12.6369458128 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.1260098522 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 11.5310837438 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.32886699507 102% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 55.0591133005 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 58.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.