Problems and benefits for high school students study plays and works of theaters written centuries ago. Discuss your own experience

Essay topics:

Problems and benefits for high school students study plays and works of theaters written centuries ago. Discuss your own experience

The importance of students play and works in theaters which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming it is beneficial while reject this notion. This essay will further elaborate both aspects of this trend and this will lead to a logical conclusion.

There are myriad of reason while will further explain this argument but the most preponderant stems from the fact that studying in theater is beneficial for universities students as well as they take knowledge about their culture and traditions therefore will respect their ancestors. For instance, theaters are beneficial for next generation. Another pivotal aspect for this argument is that theatres provided good skills to adults therefore adolescent know their responsibilities. Needless to say all merits stand students play and works in theater in a good stead.

However, there are some pitfalls that negate this argument and which can certainly overwhelm the potential influence of this trend but the most alarming is that theaters are fully wastage of time as well as theaters decrease student attention to studies. As an illustration, theaters give hazardous effect on student mind. It is apparent why many are against students play and works in theaters.

According to the argument aforementioned above, one can reach a conclusion that the benefit of students play and works in theaters are instrumental indeed. Nevertheless, the potential drawbacks should not be overlooked either.

Votes
Average: 8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-09-26 Jaskaransingh11 80 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, look, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 31.9359605911 72% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1261.0 1207.87684729 104% => OK
No of words: 231.0 242.827586207 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45887445887 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89030991744 2.71678728327 106% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 139.433497537 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580086580087 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 378.0 379.143842365 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.6876692225 50.4703680194 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.636363636 104.977214359 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.9669160288 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.81818181818 7.25397266985 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217786678867 0.242375264174 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0969826610116 0.0925447433944 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0631243919061 0.071462118173 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138031157886 0.151781067708 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0371561276934 0.0609392437508 61% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 12.6369458128 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 11.5310837438 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 55.0591133005 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.