A recent trend in the entertainment world is to adapt classic works of literature for either TV or the movies. One argument is that this is to everyone’s benefits, as it introduces people to works they might otherwise never have experienced, while others say that turning books into movies not only cheapens the original, but is rarely done successfully. In your opinion, do works of literature translate effectively to the screen?
The pure projection of classical works of literature in movies as compared to books has always been the point of discussion. Some people think that literature work cannot be successfully presented in a movie whilst others maintain that work of literature can be easily produced.
Initially, to translate and relay literature work on-screen requires extreme experience. Therefore, owing to the sophistication of the work professionals exercise extreme care. Moreover, people involved in such activity do not possess any kind of real life experience of classic, they need to have strong imaginative and creative skills to attract a large number of audience. Resultantly, this delicate and highly skilled work can be projected on screen by artists utilizing their professional acumen.
On the other hand, art media workers are required to create a complete picture and plot line unlike as specified in the books. Filming of books has proved to be quite easy as the writer of the book uses his complete innate skills to transfer the real picture to the reader. Further, entertainment world can utilize the writer’s skill and transform it to project on the screen. As an example, filming of books like Harry potter has proved to be easier than projecting historical scenes from movies like Troy. As a result, it is quite evident that projection of books onto cinema screens is easier than displaying complex art and literature works.
In conclusion, this essay has discussed with extreme care art and literature work can be easily projected onto the screens of cinema.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-06-25 | JyotiKumari19 | 86 | view |
- Social media should be banned Agree or disagree 82
- As a result of advances in medical care average life expectancy is increasing for men and women Do you think most people will see this as a positive development What are the disadvantages of an ageing population for individuals and society Support your po 65
- Artificial intelligence and robots are increasingly being used to replace human jobs. Some believe that robots will eventually take over all our jobs. Which sentence do you agree with? 55
- It is believed that universities should enroll men and women in equal numbers. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 55
- Earlier technological development brought more benefits and changed the lives of ordinary people more than recent technological development. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 55
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 349, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ginative and creative skills to attract a large number of audience. Resultantly, this delicate an...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, therefore, in conclusion, kind of, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 20.9802955665 48% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1325.0 1207.87684729 110% => OK
No of words: 253.0 242.827586207 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2371541502 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85270364834 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592885375494 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 419.4 379.143842365 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.4062786487 50.4703680194 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 110.416666667 104.977214359 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0833333333 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.91666666667 7.25397266985 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161396756746 0.242375264174 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0668633178253 0.0925447433944 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0476402930326 0.071462118173 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114093694825 0.151781067708 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0536433286356 0.0609392437508 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 12.6369458128 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.1260098522 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 11.5310837438 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.32886699507 115% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 55.0591133005 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.