In recent years some websites have appeared which allow students to grade their teachers. Some people believe that this is a good idea, while others think that these websites give power to the wrong people.
Choose which position you most agree with and discuss why you chose that position. Support your point of view with details from your own experiences, observations or reading.
The Internet is being used to discuss many matters of our life. Similarly, some websites have appeared which allow students to grade their teachers. Some people are in the view that this is a good idea, however, some people don’t agree with this and think that these websites give power to the wrong people. This easy will discuss websites should not be used to grade teachers.
Using websites to grade teachers is not a good idea. Grading teacher based on their teaching skill need in-depth knowledge. Most of the websites don’t use the proper method to grade teachers which lead to false grading. This false grade can impact on the professional life of teachers. For example, a teacher who gets a bad grade on the website may get disappointed and leave the teaching field.
Websites should be discouraged from grading educators. The website which grade educator may be used by bad people to defame the teachers. For example, students who don’t perform well in their studies may use these websites to give the false grade to their teachers. Moreover, these websites can be used to pressurize educator to promote non-performing students to the next classes.
This easy discussed the negative impacts of using websites to grade teachers. Therefore, I believe that grading educators using websites is not a good idea and it should be discouraged.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 186, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...good idea and it should be discouraged.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, moreover, similarly, so, therefore, well, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 8.36945812808 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.75862068966 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1144.0 1207.87684729 95% => OK
No of words: 225.0 242.827586207 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08444444444 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59296674549 2.71678728327 95% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 139.433497537 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.475555555556 0.580463131201 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 354.6 379.143842365 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.65517241379 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.5024630542 73% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.1857950404 50.4703680194 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 76.2666666667 104.977214359 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0 20.9669160288 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.73333333333 7.25397266985 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.414380262111 0.242375264174 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.170973776212 0.0925447433944 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129174852462 0.071462118173 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.289246925466 0.151781067708 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.135329152927 0.0609392437508 222% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 12.6369458128 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 53.1260098522 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.9458128079 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.59 11.5310837438 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.32886699507 92% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 55.0591133005 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.94827586207 60% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.3980295567 77% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.