With the rise in popularity of the internet, newspapers will soon become a thing of the past. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Recently, the phenomenon of the internet and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of online news is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that internet can be a plus and I will analyze that in this essay.

From the environmental standpoint, online news and internet can provide a society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that eco-friendly as well as easy access, are inextricably bound up. According to my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered with the use of technological tools acquire the latest news without cutting down more trees. Thus, the beneficial consequences of environmentally friendly and accessibility apparently can be seen.

Within the realm of the technology, the internet might exacerbate the consequences of news. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of cyber news related to this reality that the demerit of online tidings pertains to widespread rumours instead of the true story. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertook by a prestigious university has asserted the downsides of online news is correlated negatively with the fast publishing of false information. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of surfing the internet.

To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of internet using far overweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of high-speed tidings spreading prove the significance of widely used around the world, but also pinpoint environmental implications.

Votes
Average: 7.7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1506.0 1207.87684729 125% => OK
No of words: 270.0 242.827586207 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.57777777778 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27357965095 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637037037037 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 379.143842365 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.9049985794 50.4703680194 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.5 104.977214359 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0892155327613 0.242375264174 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0332445225671 0.0925447433944 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0239258850876 0.071462118173 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0517030117291 0.151781067708 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00753387808558 0.0609392437508 12% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.38 11.5310837438 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.4 8.32886699507 125% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 55.0591133005 176% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.