The role of a library in keeping books is obsolete. so university should be digital media. what is your opinion.
The importance of the role a library in keeping book is obsolete. So university should be use digital media which was always datable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while others reject this notion. The substantial influence of these trends has sparked the controversy over the potential impact in recent years. In my opinion, the former proposition appears to be more rational. This easy will further elaborate my view for favoring the positive impact of this trend and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
There are myriad of reasons which will further elaborate this argument but the most preponderant one steam from the fact that technology is increase day by day the digital media is more effective for young students for knowledge. Consequently, people are busy now days in works so not time for read books all people like laptop, computer the people easily search the website again knowledge. Another pivotal aspect of this trends is that digital media is more effective for all types people like young people, students, old people. The younger students read news every country throw the digital media. Needless to say, all these merits stand in a good stead.
According to the arguments aforementioned above, one can reach to a conclusion effects is that the benefits of so universities should use digital media are indeed too great to ignore.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 91, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...ok is obsolete. So university should be use digital media which was always datable ...
^^^
Line 2, column 418, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...in knowledge. Another pivotal aspect of this trends is that digital media is more ef...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, so, thus, while, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 8.36945812808 24% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 31.9359605911 75% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1177.0 1207.87684729 97% => OK
No of words: 232.0 242.827586207 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07327586207 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62816184639 2.71678728327 97% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 139.433497537 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60775862069 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 375.3 379.143842365 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.5670988926 50.4703680194 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.0 104.977214359 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0909090909 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45454545455 7.25397266985 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.12807881773 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257529552349 0.242375264174 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103871438207 0.0925447433944 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112344573131 0.071462118173 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178105819593 0.151781067708 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0651836395459 0.0609392437508 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 12.6369458128 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.5310837438 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 55.0591133005 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.