Should employees be considered the part of the decision-making process?
Decision making is very crucial to the success of any company. Should the employees be included in the decision-making process is the moot question. I will express complete agreement that the employees should be considered as a part of decision making and will offer reasons to support my viewpoint.
The employees of any company are a source of knowledge and information. Taking the opinion and prestigious views of the employees not only reduces the cost of the company for the outsourcing but it also helps to increase the self-confidence of the employees, they give them the acute feeling that they are the part of the organization, boosts up the teamwork spirit, enhances the communication skills and heightens their overall morale.
A company is a combination of teamwork. The success is achieved if everyone is performing his duty in the best possible manner at his position. The manager should have the right confidence in his employee and the employee at the same time should make sure that his delivering the best. By involving the employees in the decision-making process provides them the right environment to think out of the box and come out of their comfort zone. The result is promising which provides the employee with the freedom to act accordingly and helps to attain job satisfaction.
To warp up, in the view of above discussion, I hold the opinion that the employees should definitely be considered a part of the decision making process in order to strive for the betterment and bright future of the company.
- Effect of the native region in one's success achievement. 77
- Large shopping malls are replacing small shops. Your opinion? Good or bad 77
- In under developed countries, tourism has disadvantages and can be said theopposite as well. 11
- Imitating celebrities in sports and movies good or bad? 77
- global warming 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 452, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...e out of their comfort zone. The result is promising which provides the employee with the fr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ent and bright future of the company.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1286.0 1207.87684729 106% => OK
No of words: 256.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0234375 5.00649968141 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98286119984 2.71678728327 110% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 139.433497537 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51171875 0.580463131201 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 391.5 379.143842365 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 86.9267764432 50.4703680194 172% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.909090909 104.977214359 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2727272727 20.9669160288 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.72727272727 7.25397266985 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.540972562904 0.242375264174 223% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.201217236216 0.0925447433944 217% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.185503659313 0.071462118173 260% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.349862328822 0.151781067708 231% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.206917575792 0.0609392437508 340% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 12.6369458128 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.1260098522 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.5310837438 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.32886699507 100% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 55.0591133005 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.