Should University penalize students for late submission of their work?
Recently, the phenomenon of late submission penalty and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of penalizing students is highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am incline to believe that on-time submission can be a plus and I will scrutinize that throughout this essay.
From a general stand point, the university penalize system can provide the education system with some noticeable effects which rooted in the fact that the merits of student’s responsibility, as well as, programmed scholar studying are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the marvelous results of on-time university assignment submission on student’s improvement. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both educational planning system and well organized study schedule apparently can be seen.
On the other hand, late university works submission might increase the consequence of mounting unfavorable outcomes of non-constant study, moreover, fundamental aspects of unrepairable damages of late schooling would relate to this reality that the demerits of traditional education system pertain to failure of studying. As an example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of finning system is correlated negatively with student’s activity. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of educational disorders.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of the penalizing system in the universities far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of well-educated students prove the significance of modern training strategies, but also pinpoint long-term implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 314, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'inclined'.
Suggestion: inclined
...substantial number of individuals. I am incline to believe that on-time submission can ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1674.0 1207.87684729 139% => OK
No of words: 280.0 242.827586207 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.97857142857 5.00649968141 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.42201009075 2.71678728327 126% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 139.433497537 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.642857142857 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 538.2 379.143842365 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.1833939212 50.4703680194 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.181818182 104.977214359 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4545454545 20.9669160288 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.72727272727 7.25397266985 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259225625394 0.242375264174 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0834472428462 0.0925447433944 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0569315311257 0.071462118173 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146049680905 0.151781067708 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.029581331687 0.0609392437508 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.5 12.6369458128 154% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 20.72 53.1260098522 39% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 10.9458128079 152% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.7 11.5310837438 153% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.19 8.32886699507 134% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 55.0591133005 203% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.