should university penalize students for late submission of their work?
Recently, the phenomenon of penalizing students for late works has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "should university penalize students for late submission of their work?". Whereas it is a widely held view that it is highly beneficial, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the educational standpoint, submission deadlines are bound up inextricably with students' works, which indicates they lead to written assignments. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2018 demonstrates the relationship between oral examinations and overall scores. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of submitted theses is correlated positively with annual coursework.
Within the realm of individuals' perspective, without the slightest doubt, being late attribute to personal characteristics, in that it would come down to score deduction. A salient example of such attribution is educational experiences, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take educating graduates for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint universities' rules problems. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of being on time in personal life and getting a job in the future.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that the advantageous of penalizing students for late works are of more significance.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, whereas, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 8.36945812808 24% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1397.0 1207.87684729 116% => OK
No of words: 243.0 242.827586207 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.74897119342 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.35389179222 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.687242798354 0.580463131201 118% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 379.143842365 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.0826828271 50.4703680194 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.7 104.977214359 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3 20.9669160288 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.1 7.25397266985 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.396719986242 0.242375264174 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111542077433 0.0925447433944 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.187028386189 0.071462118173 262% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221688247542 0.151781067708 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.186189681153 0.0609392437508 306% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 12.6369458128 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.37 11.5310837438 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.87 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 55.0591133005 169% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.94827586207 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.