Should University penalize students for late submission of their work?
Recently, the phenomenon of penalizing students for late submission of their work in university and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of practical assignments is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the student's motivation can be a plus, and I will analyse that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, University assignments can provide society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of written assignments as well as excellent scores are inextricably bound up. According to my own example, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the reading assignments. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both overall scores apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of social science, The student's test scores might increase the consequences of a deductible score. Moreover, the fundamental aspect of the wrong method could relate to this reality that the demerit of late assignments is pertaining to fewer marks in final exams. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of difficult assignments is correlated with the delayed assignments. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of university principles.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of penalty for late submission in university for work far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of homework assignments prove the significance of a college student, but also pinpoint practical implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-11-03 | yasamin62 | 85 | view |
| 2020-11-03 | yasamin62 | 85 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | gupta-vikas | 55 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | gupta-vikas | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-07 | jashan randhawa | 89 | view |
- sports, playing in a team or individual? what are the reviews and possible solutions for that? discuss. 85
- Many people around the world are choosing to move to live in cities. What problems do many people experience in big cities.? should governments encourage people to move to smaller towns? 88
- Violence portrayed on TV and in the movies leads to an increase in crime in our society. People who watch violent movies are more likely to become criminals. Do you agree or disagree? 77
- Some say that music is as important as other subjects in schools to promote learning in children life. Do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion. 85
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. Cashless society seems to be a reality, and how realistic do you think it is? What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon? 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 384, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...uals. I am inclined to believe that the students motivation can be a plus, and I will an...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1521.0 1207.87684729 126% => OK
No of words: 271.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61254612546 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26101987466 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608856088561 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 379.143842365 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7289631963 50.4703680194 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.75 104.977214359 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5833333333 20.9669160288 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.309063611749 0.242375264174 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101535094104 0.0925447433944 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.142926388658 0.071462118173 200% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183545840162 0.151781067708 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100524438988 0.0609392437508 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 12.6369458128 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 11.5310837438 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.26 8.32886699507 123% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 55.0591133005 173% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.