Should we preserve past historical buildings? How much care should be taken by their owners in terms of maintenance?
There is a difference of opinion among people about preserving Historical building. While some people believe that historical building should be protected, others stand against this notion stating that it is of waste of money. In my opinion, i would say that ancient building are to be protected as it represents the culture of a country and also could bring economic benefits to the country.
One of the predominant reasons for people to support this phenomenon is that the rich cultural heritage behind each one of these monuments. They believe that their culture is shown to the world through these buildings. For example, Students in countries like London or India often visits these kinds of buildings as part of their educational excursion to acquire knowledge about their roots.
Another potential reason to conserve the historical buildings is that it could bring economic benefits to a country. It is undeniable that these buildings are marvellous pieces of complex engineering which could attract many tourists if it is maintained properly thereby improving nation’s economic growth.
Conversely, some people are of the opinion that spending money on these buildings is of no use. This is because they think that investing on other things such as international business or inventions would benefit them. Although this is a fact, it stands short in front of the paramount benefits that these building would bring to the country and people. Hence governments should invest substantial amount of money to protect these buildings.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that historical buildings encompassed the world in historical times which not only represent the rich culture of a community but also uplift the economic status of the country. Therefore it should be protected by governments thereby preserving the cultural values for the future generation.
- Education system that assess the student's learning by written exam is correct? Discuss your view? 77
- When computers first appeared on the scene, it was thought they would make us more productive in providing goods and services, smarter and possibly happier. Skeptics claim that the opposite is true as computers have proved disappointing in terms of produc 84
- Whether English will remain to be the global language despite globalization 76
- Some people believe laws change human behavior. Do you agree with it? 55
- Vegetarianism is more ethical practice than eating meat. Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with this statement. Support your point of view with reasons and/or examples from your own experience or observations. 55
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 243, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...it is of waste of money. In my opinion, i would say that ancient building are to ...
^
Line 7, column 355, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
... would bring to the country and people. Hence governments should invest substantial a...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 212, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...ift the economic status of the country. Therefore it should be protected by governments t...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, hence, if, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.5418719212 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 5.94088669951 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 38.0 20.9802955665 181% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.75862068966 35% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1592.0 1207.87684729 132% => OK
No of words: 294.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41496598639 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82841894404 2.71678728327 104% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 139.433497537 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520408163265 0.580463131201 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 484.2 379.143842365 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8189781437 50.4703680194 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.714285714 104.977214359 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.9669160288 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.57142857143 7.25397266985 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177436104264 0.242375264174 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0679656635594 0.0925447433944 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0495105841747 0.071462118173 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107805610674 0.151781067708 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.054240811119 0.0609392437508 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 12.6369458128 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 11.5310837438 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 55.0591133005 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.