Should wealthy nations help poor countries with food and education, or is it the responsibility of poor nations to improve their condition?
Recently, the phenomenon of helping poor countries with food and education and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matters of wealthy nations are highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to conceive that improving the condition can be a plus, and I will investigate that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, helping poor countries can provide the society with noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits, as well as the advantages of efficient education, are visible. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the importance of responsible nations. Thus, beneficial ramifications of improving the situation are remarkable.
From a scientific point of view, helping nations with food can supply the community with negative impacts which are associated with the reality that the demerits of irresponsible governments are crucial. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by an elite university described dependent countries. Hence, predicted outcomes of aggravating the condition are critical.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of helping poor nations with food and education far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of improving the condition prove the significance of a wealthy nation, but also pinpoint possible implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1332.0 1207.87684729 110% => OK
No of words: 233.0 242.827586207 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.71673819742 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20390793629 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618025751073 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 421.2 379.143842365 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.698434681 50.4703680194 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.090909091 104.977214359 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1818181818 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.428837855914 0.242375264174 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124965492126 0.0925447433944 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0926293375493 0.071462118173 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.239905850709 0.151781067708 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0857153649569 0.0609392437508 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 11.5310837438 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.85 8.32886699507 130% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 55.0591133005 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.