In some countries, there have been schemes to encourage older professional people to retrain as school teachers. Do you feel that this is likely to have beneficial effects on education? Support your point of view with reasons and/or examples from your own experience.
In today's rapidly changing job market, the deficit of such vital professionals as teachers has become the subject of considerable concern in some countries. Thus, their education systems started to provide different benefit programs to attract high experienced people in certain areas to share their knowledge with children after appropriate retraining. Despite the widely supported opinion that younger teachers may have the better impact on children's mind, this essay will prove that encouraging older experts definitely have positive effects on the contemporary school learning.
To begin with, the education system frequently cannot keep up with the constant dramatic progress. Consequently, young teachers being armed with mostly theoretical knowledge from their universities tend to provide already outdated information to pupils. While people who have not only academical, but priceless empirical experience, might significantly increase the interest of schoolchildren in the study of any subject. For instance, the last research conducted by Australian Department of Education reveals that the level of kids' motivation is directly correlated with teachers' competence and real experience in related area.
In addition, the scheme of retraining older professionals in educators is mainly advantageous due to the possibility to familiarize students in detail with the certain scientific occupations, as well as their pros and cons. Therefore, this unique opportunity could dramatically increase the number of future academic specialists, too. For example, Australia's national skilled volunteering program has shown excellent results in 2022 after involving professional scientists as part-time job educators in middle primary schools.
In conclusion, I firmly believe that encouraging older experts from various professional fields to requalify in tutors is potentially quantum leap towards brand new education system.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-03 | architakamjps@gmail.com | 77 | view |
| 2023-01-14 | Yuli | 88 | view |
- More and more wild animals are on the verge of extinction and others are on the endangered list What are the reasons for this What can be done to solve this problem 77
- Some people point out that experiential learning can work well in formal education However other think a traditional form of teaching is the best Do you think experiential learning is beneficial in high school or college 56
- As cities expanding some people claim governments should look forward creating better networks of public transportation available for everyone rather than building more roads for vehicle owning population What s your opinion Give some examples or experien 77
- Many sports players advertise sport related products What are the advantages and disadvantages of this 85
- Governments should provide free healthcare to everyone in society How far do you agree with this statement Support your point of view with reasons and or examples from your own experience 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, if, may, so, therefore, thus, well, while, as to, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.5418719212 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 8.36945812808 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 20.9802955665 52% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 31.9359605911 138% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1655.0 1207.87684729 137% => OK
No of words: 272.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 6.08455882353 5.00649968141 122% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09169755151 2.71678728327 114% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 139.433497537 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.694852941176 0.580463131201 120% => OK
syllable_count: 509.4 379.143842365 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1299541881 50.4703680194 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.454545455 104.977214359 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7272727273 20.9669160288 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.5454545455 7.25397266985 187% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249971134924 0.242375264174 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.080690583056 0.0925447433944 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0492229618822 0.071462118173 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136682863709 0.151781067708 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0396296436198 0.0609392437508 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.6 12.6369458128 155% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 21.74 53.1260098522 41% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.9458128079 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.28 11.5310837438 159% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.39 8.32886699507 137% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 55.0591133005 205% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.