In this current era, inevitable competition conditions and future career expectations are getting faced by children in the very early stages of development and growth. Due to this, children are getting inculcated with enormous knowledge and extreme study curriculum that is eventually causing harmful effects in their natural growth process. And, introducing foreign language study at such early stages can help them in many ways, but introduces some serious drawbacks which cannot be overlooked.
Since, human's learning thrive is extremely higher and productive at the early stage as children, so, knowing or learning a foreign language at younger age is much easier as compared to the latter. Also, with the commencement of whole new level of grammar, rules and learning which is extremely novel, can actually help in providing positive impact on their thinking and future life. Moreover, learning new language helps in improving cultural horizon and providing crucial cross-cultural awareness leading to overall personality development.
In contrast, exposure to such overwhelming content of new language can affect their learning ability to learn their actual mother tongue properly. As, they might get confused between parts of speech, intonations and other language intricacies. Also, this might introduce less devotion on core subjects such as Mathematics, Science etc, which is very important for their future growth and development. Eventually, such cumbersome curriculum will introduce too much load on these young kids, which can cause other unwanted health issues and problems, that can be avoided if demands would have been set within the acceptable limits.
Hence, it can be concluded that introducing foreign language at primary school is beneficial to the children but comes with serious inevitable limitations which cannot be neglected so easily.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 24, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to thrive'
Suggestion: to thrive
...e overlooked. Since, humans learning thrive is extremely higher and productive at t...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 171, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
... language at younger age is much easier as compared to the latter. Also, with the ...
^^
Line 5, column 581, Rule ID: IF_WOULD_HAVE_VBN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'had been'?
Suggestion: had been
...roblems, that can be avoided if demands would have been set within the acceptable limits. He...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, hence, if, look, moreover, so, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 6.10837438424 196% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 8.36945812808 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1592.0 1207.87684729 132% => OK
No of words: 281.0 242.827586207 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.66548042705 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79934806523 2.71678728327 103% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626334519573 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 379.143842365 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 32.1015949245 50.4703680194 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.727272727 104.977214359 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5454545455 20.9669160288 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.54545454545 7.25397266985 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174930704826 0.242375264174 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0684206260771 0.0925447433944 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0520445817965 0.071462118173 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116601605975 0.151781067708 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0387093508522 0.0609392437508 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 12.6369458128 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 53.1260098522 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 11.5310837438 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.05 8.32886699507 121% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 55.0591133005 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.