Over-packed products are increasing at a tremendous rate in the market. While some proponents believe it is the responsibility of the consumers to be more discerning by avoiding purchase of such products, others believe this problem can be solved at the producer level. This essay will discuss why extra packaging of products should be taken seriously by both consumer and producer equally.
Consumers should purchase products in a more responsible manner. Products which are over packed pose a threat to the environment and introduce inevitable garbage problems. For example, products over-packed with plastic polythenes, being a non-biodegradable resource, pose serious implications for the living species, exacerbate garbage issues and can cause serious damage to the ecosystem. Thereby, avoiding such overly packed products helps in keeping the environment safe and clean.
On the other hand, producer should also restrict extra packaging of products. Products should be checked and while assuring their quality, packaging should be taken into consideration seriously. For instance, any product found with unwanted packaging should be discarded at the time of quality checks which will ensure environment-friendly products generation. Thus, it is the responsibility of the producer to restrict such products at the production level in order to ensure eco-friendly units being delivered at the consumer end.
Over-packed products are gradually imposing a serious threat to the environment. In my opinion, both consumers and producers should take this situation more seriously, thereby avoiding consumption and implementation of such over-packed products which will eventually make our ecosystem cleaner place to live in.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, then, thus, while, for example, for instance, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 6.10837438424 196% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 20.9802955665 38% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1480.0 1207.87684729 123% => OK
No of words: 253.0 242.827586207 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.84980237154 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20209823568 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 139.433497537 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541501976285 0.580463131201 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 459.0 379.143842365 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.6452202129 50.4703680194 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.846153846 104.977214359 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4615384615 20.9669160288 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.76923076923 7.25397266985 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 2.75862068966 254% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.471283621542 0.242375264174 194% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.197464729763 0.0925447433944 213% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0517268662616 0.071462118173 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.313653914381 0.151781067708 207% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.01588137718 0.0609392437508 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 12.6369458128 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 53.1260098522 66% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.65 11.5310837438 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.32886699507 114% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 55.0591133005 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.