In this highly competitive era, for the survival and growth of the organizations, many companies are including employees in the critical decision-making process of their goods and services. Many proponents are debating over the advantages of this phenomena, however, other experts hold opposite view stating that given more power and rights to employees can have detrimental effects. In this article, we will discuss both the positive aspects and negative impacts of this latest corporate trend.
To begin with, there are numerous benefits of engaging employees in the decision making of goods and services, first, they are in tight touch with the market and consumers, so their feedbacks on improving product and pricing can be a game changer for capturing the larger market share. Moreover, they share practical suggestions based on their ground experience. For Instance, our company was able to reduce significant cost on manufacturing process by embedding production related feedbacks from the shop floor supervisors and workers. Furthermore, employees feel a sense of ownership and motivated by including them in decision-making processes pertaining to critical policies for goods and services.
On the other hand, there is a negligible downside of over-involvement of employees in the decision-making process, sometimes they tend to make policies which are biased and more suitable to them, this situation has severe effects and has a serious impact on the growth of an organization. Additionally, feedbacks and suggestions from everyone can create mess and chaos in the company.
In conclusion, from the above examples, it is evident that if integrate employees in decision making along with right touch and rich experience of senior management, can achieve wonders for the organizations and can be proved to be boon, otherwise can turn in to ban.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 243, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...nts are debating over the advantages of this phenomena, however, other experts hold ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, for instance, in conclusion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 8.36945812808 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 31.9359605911 147% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1577.0 1207.87684729 131% => OK
No of words: 287.0 242.827586207 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49477351916 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11068462309 2.71678728327 114% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585365853659 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 379.143842365 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.5024630542 137% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 73.080503556 50.4703680194 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 157.7 104.977214359 150% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.7 20.9669160288 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8 7.25397266985 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.363892817486 0.242375264174 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131311362269 0.0925447433944 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0951415413886 0.071462118173 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200380053246 0.151781067708 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0724758141786 0.0609392437508 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 12.6369458128 149% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 53.1260098522 65% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.9458128079 141% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 11.5310837438 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.92 8.32886699507 119% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 55.0591133005 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.3980295567 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.