Some organizations integrate employees in decision making process of their goods and services. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this.
Recently, the phenomenon of credit cards and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of smart cards is highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined that the modern transaction methods can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, cashless society can provide the society with some noticeable effects which rooted in the fact that the merits of social welfare, as well as wealthy banks, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered outstanding advantages of cashless society. Thus, the beneficial ramifications of both online money’s transfer and safety payment ways apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, cashless charging methods might increase the consequence of lack of paper money. Moreover, fundamental aspects of manual payments would relate to this reality that the demerits of banking operations pertain to cash handling costs. As an example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of traditional payment methods is correlated negatively with old-fashioned shopping. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of money and hard cash conservation costs.
To conclude, while there are compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of credit-based financial system far weigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of cashless trading prove the significance of online banking improvement, but also pinpoint long-term implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1503.0 1207.87684729 124% => OK
No of words: 263.0 242.827586207 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.71482889734 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18475056355 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.669201520913 0.580463131201 115% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 379.143842365 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.5167389319 50.4703680194 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.25 104.977214359 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9166666667 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0529286984269 0.242375264174 22% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0167757780514 0.0925447433944 18% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0170073616129 0.071462118173 24% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0285702820414 0.151781067708 19% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0061320862367 0.0609392437508 10% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 12.6369458128 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 11.5310837438 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.8 8.32886699507 130% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 55.0591133005 185% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.