Some people believe that academic subjects such as chemistry, physics, and history should be taught in schools, while others believe that students will derive more benefit from studying practical subjects, such as motor mechanics and cooking.
It is argued that schools should concentrate on teaching practical subjects than the theoratical subjects. This essay would discuss on the pros and cons of teaching theoratical subjects in school.
Students should be taught theoratical subjects in school because it influences people for more innovations. On the other hand students are not interested in studying history from a private place because those subjects does not have a market value. However students should know about their ancestors, country’s history for their knowledge irrespective of the market value of the subject. Furthermore, students who are interested on motor mechanics or cooking can be learnt from a vocational training institute once they finish their school education.
Nevertheless, some people may think that the time spent on studying theoratical subjects is a waste. People may think that students could utilize this time to learn practical subjects than the theoratical subjects which is beneficial in finding a job in the future.
In conclusion, it is recommended to teach both theoratical and practical subjects to students because both the subjects add value to their carreers. The governments, which bears the responsibility on deciding the academic syllabus should focus on blending both the subjects in an appropriate proportionate in order to cater the future labour market in an effective manner.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-05 | neethujithin | 80 | view |
| 2019-01-20 | neelu sharma | 85 | view |
| 2018-12-16 | arami | 100 | view |
| 2018-09-28 | Alka | 80 | view |
| 2018-08-06 | Fiona Joanna Cruz | 85 | view |
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes (for example working for a charity, improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children. 84
- Some people believe that the sole aim of higher education is to make people ready for employment. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Discuss. 55
- University only requires applying media rather than continously upgrading text book. Agree or disagree? 88
- In order to study effectively it requires comfort peace and time So it is impossible for a student to combine learning and employment at the same time because one distracts the other Do you think this statement is realistic in today s life 74
- Some democrats claim that people who do not take part in voting processes do not have the right to complaint about the situation their communities are in. What is your position regarding this opinion? 72
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 249, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... subjects does not have a market value. However students should know about their ancest...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 350, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an effective manner" with adverb for "effective"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...order to cater the future labour market in an effective manner.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, may, nevertheless, so, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 8.36945812808 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.75862068966 17% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1192.0 1207.87684729 99% => OK
No of words: 213.0 242.827586207 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.59624413146 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.92707691288 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03272576322 2.71678728327 112% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 139.433497537 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.539906103286 0.580463131201 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 351.0 379.143842365 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.9906567461 50.4703680194 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.2 104.977214359 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3 20.9669160288 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.7 7.25397266985 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246150405289 0.242375264174 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109454290186 0.0925447433944 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0479246273561 0.071462118173 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139390857134 0.151781067708 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0579912902863 0.0609392437508 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.2 11.5310837438 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.32886699507 101% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 55.0591133005 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.