Some people believe that one family should have one car and encourage them to use alternative source. Agree/Disagree
There is no doubt that digitization has taken the technology to new heights, and the inventions have made the human life easier. Cars are the one of these inventions which has not only made life comfortable, but has also made the travelling faster. These days, keeping more than one car has become trend whereas some intellectuals suggest that it is better to keep only one car. In my opinion, it is in the favor of society to keep not more than one car.
Undoubtedly, traffic congestion is one of the major issues in front of the governments these days, and cars are creating this issue more complex. Government can encourage people to use public transport instead of using their own vehicle. This will not only solve the traffic congestion but also resolve the problem of pollution. Moreover, public transports are much cheaper method of travelling; this will further lead the natives to save money.
In addition to this, it has observed that people use car more often have higher chances to get obese. It is essential to encourage citizens to use methods like; walking, cycling to travel. Recent research has revealed, people who travel short distance, walking or by cycling are more fit in comparison to the denizens who use car.
In the end, it can be concluded that promoting different sources of transportation and encouraging nationalists to avoid keeping more than one car can help the society as well as the whole nation.
- The main purpose of libraries is to provide books. Therefore high tech media such as DVD’s, videos software’s and internet may not be provided. 80
- Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are role models for youngsters. Do you support it or not? 11
- Do you think consumers should avoid over packaged products or is it the responsibility of producers? 55
- Certain kind of music promotes learning in children. 72
- Do you think English will remain a global language despite globalization 74
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, well, whereas, in addition, no doubt, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1199.0 1207.87684729 99% => OK
No of words: 244.0 242.827586207 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91393442623 5.00649968141 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65037849771 2.71678728327 98% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 139.433497537 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553278688525 0.580463131201 95% => OK
syllable_count: 378.9 379.143842365 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.941243801 50.4703680194 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.9166666667 104.977214359 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 20.9669160288 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 7.25397266985 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259454129692 0.242375264174 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0968114924001 0.0925447433944 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0595584807945 0.071462118173 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148263770371 0.151781067708 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0388017372285 0.0609392437508 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 12.6369458128 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.1260098522 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.5310837438 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.32886699507 105% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 55.0591133005 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.