some people believe that universities should not provide so much theoretical knowledge but give more practical training throughout their courses. Do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of providing theoretical knowledge by universities and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that more practical training is highly beneficial, such issue regarded as thoroughly constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that practices in their courses can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
To begin with, there are various reasons to agree with more practical lessons in the university. At first, theoric lessons are useful to know the root of knowledge. However, theoric courses are not enough to become a specialist in an art. For example, the study of some knowledge such as archaeology and architecture need to practical lessons to make students able to work.
In addition, the theories are necessary before doing practical knowledge. But it can not represent all aspects of an expertise. For instance, a recent scientific research conducted by MTN University researchers in 206 has shown that a significant number of studies such as pilot need to low theoretical courses and many hours flying to become an experienced and reliable pilot.
In conclusion, while there are several compelling arguments on this statement, I profoundly believe that despite the importance of theoric knowledge, practical courses are more beneficial to become more experienced and have fewer drawbacks than theories.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-06-03 | mojtaba1980 | 80 | view |
- The claim that animals have rights has been subjected as a matter of debate since the 1970’s. Are zoos helping or hurting our animals? Should zoos be banned? 77
- With the right amount of motivation and practice, people can learn anything that the experts teach in the classroom. Do you agree or disagree? 88
- Nowadays many young people leave home at an early age to either study or work in another city.'Do you think this has more advantages or disadvantages for young people? Support your point of view with reasons and examples from your own experience. 61
- Communication has changed significantly in the last 10 years. Discuss pros and cons of this change. Support your point of view with reasons and examples from your own experience 77
- A common marketing strategy for big companies is to introduce various offers and discounts. However, these strategies may have impact on their reputation. What are some of the impacts? Support your point of view with details from your own experiences. 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Recently, the phenomenon of providing th...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll analyze that throughout this essay. To begin with, there are various reasons...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lessons to make students able to work. In addition, the theories are necessary ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ome an experienced and reliable pilot. In conclusion, while there are several c...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 20.9802955665 62% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1220.0 1207.87684729 101% => OK
No of words: 224.0 242.827586207 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44642857143 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10425512361 2.71678728327 114% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 139.433497537 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611607142857 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 388.8 379.143842365 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.059120333 50.4703680194 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.909090909 104.977214359 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3636363636 20.9669160288 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2727272727 7.25397266985 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 2.91625615764 240% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21714770719 0.242375264174 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0721534164357 0.0925447433944 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0510417044383 0.071462118173 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12177998894 0.151781067708 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0599910412831 0.0609392437508 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 12.6369458128 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.1260098522 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 11.5310837438 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.7 8.32886699507 116% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 55.0591133005 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.