Some people feel that manufacturers and supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging of goods. While others argue that customers should avoid buying goods with a lot of packaging. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Packaging plays an essential role in preventing any good from getting damaged during sell, or transporting it from one place to another. But, there has been noticed many problems due to packaging therefore some opine that manufacturers and supermarkets should come forward to minimize excessive packaging along with customers. Now, I am going to delve into both views and give my opinion.
To begin with, in this competitive era, supermarkets and manufacturers lure customers to buy more and more goods thereby they promote more use of packaging which in turn create later several complications but they should reduce it due to manifold reasons. Firstly, quality of goods is the major factor which customers take into consideration, and this consideration of quality can easily be ensured by supermarkets, thereby they can conveniently reduces packaging. Secondly, supermarkets and manufacturers are mostly making branded goods, so they should not have any problem about the issue of decline in sell, thus they can reduce packaging to a great extent. Furthermore, supermarkets can give various offers on goods so that customer should not care about packaging.
However, customer can help in reducing packaging because supermarkets mostly focus on huge packaging to fulfill all the requirements of customers. Correspondingly, customer can help in declining packaging owing to many possible reasons. Firstly, if customer will prefer the product with minimal packaging then it will help manufacturers and supermarkets to pay heed on using simple packaging. Secondly, customers must primarily focus on quality and cost of the product. As a result, supermarkets will emphasize more over quality with an affordable price and not on packaging. For instance, it has been found in various surveys that people mostly gravitate towards quality and price of product, regardless any other factor.
In conclusion, there should be a collaborative approach for declining packaging by both supermarkets and customers, as it may results better outcomes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-27 | kuldeep sharma | 55 | view |
- Some people think that the modern technology is making people more sociable while others think it is making them less sociable Discuss both the views and give your opinion 88
- The number of older people is increasing in many parts of the world. What are the effects of this on society as a whole? What are the advantages or disadvantages of this trend? 100
- Demand for food is increasing worldwide What is the cause of this What measures can the international community take to make sure the supply of food is enough 86
- Some believe that lot of scientific research is a waste of time and money To what extent do you agree or disagree 82
- Nowadays, large shopping centers and supermarkets are more common than small local shops. Is this a negative or positive development? 100
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 451, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'reduce'
Suggestion: reduce
...ermarkets thereby they can conveniently reduces packaging. Secondly, supermarkets and m...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, thus, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.5418719212 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 6.10837438424 246% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 31.9359605911 144% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1731.0 1207.87684729 143% => OK
No of words: 311.0 242.827586207 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56591639871 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 3.92707691288 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10560000617 2.71678728327 114% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549839228296 0.580463131201 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 547.2 379.143842365 144% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.7506125318 50.4703680194 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.4 104.977214359 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7333333333 20.9669160288 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1333333333 7.25397266985 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 2.91625615764 206% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.318031808183 0.242375264174 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107180555408 0.0925447433944 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0487140927434 0.071462118173 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181486578834 0.151781067708 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0454394962391 0.0609392437508 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 12.6369458128 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 11.5310837438 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.32886699507 100% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 55.0591133005 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.