Some people indicate that certain kind of music can promote learning for young children, while many researches showed that results are mixed. What is your opinion? Use your own experience and observation.
Nowadays method of teaching has significantly changed which includes use of music to develop interest of children. Although, some people prefer the use of music for learning but several researches have varied opinion. This essay will discuss that learning in children is affected by others factors rather than specific type of music.
To begin with, to be able to learn new things a child must have at least average IQ level. Although the depth of understanding may vary according to intelligence of children but having an average IQ level they are able to learn things without any affect of music. For instance, a child with low IQ level may not be able to learn things better even if music is involved during teaching. Therefore, music does not play any significant part in learning.
Secondly, children are able to understand things betterly if practical work is involved in their courses. Practical work gives them excellent insight about any subject they study in theory. For example, a student of physics is able to understand the concepts of measuring device such as vernier caliper and micrometer effectively if he has exposure to these devices in laboratory. Hence, practical work is more effective than music in learning.
In conclusion, learning majorly depends on factors such as IQ level or practical work conducted during the studies. In my opinion, specific kind of music may be beneficial to some extent for learning better there are other important factors involved.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 201, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
... beneficial to some extent for learning better there are other important factors invol...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, at least, for example, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, such as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 5.94088669951 34% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 20.9802955665 43% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.75862068966 35% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1250.0 1207.87684729 103% => OK
No of words: 243.0 242.827586207 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14403292181 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6934022767 2.71678728327 99% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588477366255 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 395.1 379.143842365 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.560266371 50.4703680194 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.1538461538 104.977214359 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6923076923 20.9669160288 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6923076923 7.25397266985 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171697553922 0.242375264174 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0711030684695 0.0925447433944 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0712721921208 0.071462118173 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120209625958 0.151781067708 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0749773938389 0.0609392437508 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 12.6369458128 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.1260098522 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 11.5310837438 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.32886699507 107% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 55.0591133005 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 82.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 74.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.