Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change. Others, however, think that change is always a good thing. Discuss your view and give your own opinion.
Recent days, there has been a colossal upsurge in the trends to see prodigies discussing the people's preferences on their work types. While many progressively adore the ideology to do the same routine every day, others despise it. This essay will elaborate on both sides of the argument to prudently persuade why the change in daily routine is essential.
On the one hand, there are myriad of advantages to keep changing our area of work. To commence with, since in this way, people get a chance to work on many sectors, thus, it elevates their knowledge and broadens their horizon. In addition, these people are found to be happier and more content. Recent empirical research from "World's Happy People" magazine, established that people who frequently change their job, are more social and happier than the people doing the same kind of work in their whole life. Seen in this light, it is undeniable that changing job types is vital for a happy life.
Despite the advantages mentioned above, the advantages of performing the same work regularly, meanwhile, cannot be neglected. Firstly, owing to doing the same kind of task for many years, these people become expert in their field. Moreover, they do not have to learn new things every now and then, as in case of frequent job changers. However, the prominent disadvantage of this trend cannot be marginalized that is, because these people have not done any other work in their entire life, they are not flexible, and if in any case they lose their job, they are not able to earn their living.
In conclusion, owing to the above-mentioned arguments, I radically feel and believe that frequent change in work type is essential for holistic growth of every individual. Consequently, I would suggest that every person should challenge himself by stepping out of his comfort zone and try something different than his regular work.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-05 | foadihasan | 77 | view |
| 2019-07-16 | viviana | 65 | view |
| 2018-10-08 | Alka | 77 | view |
| 2018-06-29 | Manisha Verma | 77 | view |
| 2018-04-25 | azzitta | 85 | view |
- Company Top level Authorities should or should not take employees suggestions or ideas to take any decisions. Discuss? 77
- Some people believe that academic subjects such as chemistry, physics, and history should be taught in schools, while others believe that students will derive more benefit from studying practical subjects, such as motor mechanics and cooking. Discuss both 80
- Some say that music is as important as other subjects in schools, especially at the preschool level. Do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion. 73
- What are the benefits of living in big cities as opposed to rural areas What are the problems of rural areas and how can they be solved 60
- Polygamy has increased widely in recent years What solutions can you brought forward to decrease this issue 93
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 279, Rule ID: EVERY_NOW_AND_THEN[1]
Message: Use simply 'now and then'.
Suggestion: now and then
...r, they do not have to learn new things every now and then, as in case of frequent job changers. H...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 310, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[2]
Message: Did you mean 'different 'from''? 'Different than' is often considered colloquial style.
Suggestion: from
...omfort zone and try something different than his regular work.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, then, thus, while, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, in any case
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 20.9802955665 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 31.9359605911 138% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1587.0 1207.87684729 131% => OK
No of words: 316.0 242.827586207 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02215189873 5.00649968141 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 3.92707691288 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64253012665 2.71678728327 97% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 139.433497537 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572784810127 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 379.143842365 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 4.6157635468 217% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.65517241379 219% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.8316052821 50.4703680194 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.357142857 104.977214359 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5714285714 20.9669160288 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.85714285714 7.25397266985 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168134177247 0.242375264174 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0579489835413 0.0925447433944 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0397016768433 0.071462118173 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0965945018891 0.151781067708 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0481168456797 0.0609392437508 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 12.6369458128 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.1260098522 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.5310837438 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.32886699507 103% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 55.0591133005 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.