Some people say modern children's games do not develop a wide range of skills, while traditional games can be much better for developing such skills. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In this highly competitive world, acquiring a variety of abilities has become far more important than ever before. However, some argue that traditional games can better develop some skills than the contemporary games. I opine that this view is not entirely true as both types of activities have their distinct advantages.
On the one hand, modern games have their own advantage. Firstly, modern games are often operated on technologies such as computers and many of them was designed to serve an educational purpose. There are usually a wide range of different categories of games such as operational, cerebral and typing games that are better developed than the traditional games to help the young children to be familiar with activities in this era. Children are able to cope with nowadays’ technologies via such games, they are essential for them in their adult lives which no other conventional activities are able to do.
On the other hand, some classical games will help to stimulate other skills. Cooperation and communication abilities are better adapted from playing classical games such as card games. These games are often required to join a group of people in order to run. In this case, children would have to collaborate and work with other participants, which will strengthen their ability to converse and negotiate, or pay attention to other’s feelings. Such skills are extraordinarily useful in one’s future career.
In conclusion, I still reckon that skills gained from both activities can contribute significantly to an individual, there is no such thing as one is better than the other.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, so, still, then, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1371.0 1207.87684729 114% => OK
No of words: 260.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27307692308 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94932295911 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561538461538 0.580463131201 97% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.4853318478 50.4703680194 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.461538462 104.977214359 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.9669160288 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07692307692 7.25397266985 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282555906227 0.242375264174 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0973222512762 0.0925447433944 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0856463089612 0.071462118173 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152365116785 0.151781067708 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0795320741556 0.0609392437508 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 12.6369458128 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.1260098522 80% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 11.5310837438 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.32886699507 104% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 55.0591133005 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.