Recently the phenomenon of muddles advanced by usage of cars has sparked the topic of heated arguments. Some people believes that cars should be banned from metropolitan cities while on the contrary, other curtails that cars plays a salient role in mode of transportation and should not be shun. Up-to certain extent I agree that usage of cars should be restricted. In the forthcoming paragraphs, I would elaborate on the advantages and disadvantages associated with the use of cars.
Firstly, we all are very much familiarize with the consequences associated with the pollution emitted by cars, this is a global crisis and is experienced worldwide. This phenomenon is alleviating the overall circumstances linked with climate change. With increase in number of cars we are flocking the large cities roads and leading to a traffic jam. People nowadays spend more time on roads than ever before.
Secondly, It is an undeniable fact that we are governing an era where cars are the most convenient and preferred mode of transport. People cannot imagine their life without cars. Banning cars from large cities is not a good practice to follow. However, certain restrictions could be pertained by government on the usage of cars, this in turn will reduce the negative impacts. For example, government could retain a policy wherein the number of cars cramped by individuals will be limited. Additionally, government should promote the usage of more sustainable vehicles and should put more emphasis on economically friendly fuels.
To encapsulate, I would like to conclude that foregoing discussion will propounds to the view that usage of cars in large cities should be reduced. People should understand the ramifications attached with the usage of cars driven by petrol or diesel.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 73, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'propound'
Suggestion: propound
...conclude that foregoing discussion will propounds to the view that usage of cars in large...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, while, for example, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 6.10837438424 246% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 31.9359605911 144% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1504.0 1207.87684729 125% => OK
No of words: 286.0 242.827586207 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25874125874 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92579423336 2.71678728327 108% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548951048951 0.580463131201 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 471.6 379.143842365 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 12.6551724138 126% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.8166765064 50.4703680194 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.0 104.977214359 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.875 20.9669160288 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 7.25397266985 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231911114027 0.242375264174 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0786774124394 0.0925447433944 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0582461355592 0.071462118173 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14611269448 0.151781067708 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0422568238168 0.0609392437508 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 12.6369458128 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.1260098522 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.9458128079 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 11.5310837438 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.32886699507 112% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 55.0591133005 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 67.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.