Some people think foreign visitors should be charged more than local people when they visit the cultural and historical attractions in a culture country. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The importance of charging more money from foreign visitors when they visit the cultural and historical attractions which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while others reject this notion. The substantial influence of this trend has sparked the controversy over the potential impact in recent years. In my opinion, the former proposition appears to be more rational. This essay will further elaborate my views for favoring the positive impact of this trend and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
There are myriad of reasons which will further elaborate this argument but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that foreign visitors should be charged more than local people when they visit cultural and historical attractions in a culture country. Another pivotal aspect of this trend that government invest more money to historical places for instance Taj Mahal,Redfort and many more other places. If foreign pay more money to visit this places government invest money on historical places. Needless to say, all these merits stand in a good stead.
Elaborating my viewpoint, there are some more merits but one of the crucial effects is that when foreign pay the more money government can make more hotels,restraints for people. Besides, India have many beautiful historical places as well as Golden temple, Qutb Minar. foreign attracts to see the beautiful places so they always ready to pay more money . Hence, it is apparent why are in favor of this trend.
According to the arguments aforementioned above, one can reach to a conclusion that the benefits of foreign visitors should be charge more money to visit the cultural and historical attractions are indeed too great.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 373, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , Redfort
...historical places for instance Taj Mahal,Redfort and many more other places. If foreign ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 410, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...hal,Redfort and many more other places. If foreign pay more money to visit this pl...
^^
Line 9, column 156, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , restraints
...re money government can make more hotels,restraints for people. Besides, India have many be...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 195, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (India) must be used with a third-person verb: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
...s,restraints for people. Besides, India have many beautiful historical places as wel...
^^^^
Line 9, column 271, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Foreign
...s as well as Golden temple, Qutb Minar. foreign attracts to see the beautiful places so...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 354, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...s so they always ready to pay more money . Hence, it is apparent why are in favor ...
^^
Line 13, column 128, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'charged'?
Suggestion: charged
... benefits of foreign visitors should be charge more money to visit the cultural and hi...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, for instance, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1489.0 1207.87684729 123% => OK
No of words: 283.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26148409894 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73851092293 2.71678728327 101% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 139.433497537 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52296819788 0.580463131201 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 463.5 379.143842365 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.591113491 50.4703680194 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.538461538 104.977214359 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7692307692 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.69230769231 7.25397266985 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.33497536946 131% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.335654170583 0.242375264174 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120006549529 0.0925447433944 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.139516663035 0.071462118173 195% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.231107599878 0.151781067708 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.072666928721 0.0609392437508 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 12.6369458128 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 11.5310837438 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.32886699507 102% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 55.0591133005 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.