Some people think that it is better for children to learn a foreign language at primary school. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of learning Language in childhood and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of picking a language is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that communication skill for children can be a plus and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the educational standpoint, picking a language in school curriculum can provide a society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that useful critical period as well as the future job opportunity, are inextricably bound up. According to my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered those children who learned a language in their critical period have the chance of better job opportunities. Thus, the beneficial consequences of picking a language in early ages and communicational skills apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of linguistic, learning process might exacerbate the consequences of nurturing. Moreover, the fundamental aspect of education related to this reality the demerits of language pertain to compelling children. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted the downsides of the learning process are correlated negatively with child's brain. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceive the notion of opening up avenues.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of picking a new language in primary school far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of broadening the children's skills prove the significance of widely used around the world, but also pinpoint international job implications.
- Some sports are considered extremely dangerous, but many people still like them. Why do people take part in dangerous sports? Give some suggestions on how to deal with these dangers. 73
- Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are a role model for youngsters. Do you support or not? 77
- In many countries plastic bags are the main source of rubbish causing pollution in oceans and on land; therefore they should be banned. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 61
- Whether the design of the building will have a positive or negative impact on people s life and work 44
- Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information such as their hobbies and interests and whether they are married or single. Some people say that this information may be relevant and useful other disagrees.Discuss both views and g 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 437, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... brain. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceive the notion of opening up avenues. To...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1598.0 1207.87684729 132% => OK
No of words: 285.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.60701754386 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27901072846 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 139.433497537 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628070175439 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 379.143842365 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.1034346793 50.4703680194 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.166666667 104.977214359 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 20.9669160288 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180915006674 0.242375264174 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0565150858645 0.0925447433944 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0282330600882 0.071462118173 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0998696136491 0.151781067708 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0170676627705 0.0609392437508 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 12.6369458128 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 11.5310837438 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.26 8.32886699507 123% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 55.0591133005 180% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.