Some people think that it is better for children to learn a foreign language at primary school. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Recently, the phenomenon of learning Language in childhood and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of picking a language is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that communication skill for children can be a plus and I will analyze that throughout this essay.

From the educational standpoint, picking a language in school curriculum can provide a society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that jack-of-all-trades as well as the future job opportunities, are inextricably bound up. According to my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered those children who learned a language in their critical period have the chance of better job opportunities in the future. Thus, the beneficial consequences of picking a language in early ages and communicational skills apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of language, learning process might exacerbate the consequences of mental growth. Moreover, the fundamental aspect of education related to this reality the demerits of school curriculum pertain to compelling children. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted the downsides of the learning process in early age are correlated negatively with child's brain disability. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceive the notion of opening up avenues.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of picking a new language in primary school far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of broadening the children's skills prove the significance of widely used around the world, but also pinpoint capacity to remember implications.

Votes
Average: 7.7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 471, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...bility. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceive the notion of opening up avenues. To c...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 31.9359605911 132% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1636.0 1207.87684729 135% => OK
No of words: 293.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58361774744 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32460699682 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 139.433497537 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627986348123 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 379.143842365 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.4284565437 50.4703680194 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.333333333 104.977214359 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4166666667 20.9669160288 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181581977216 0.242375264174 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0556858575386 0.0925447433944 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.028135475742 0.071462118173 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0995316882034 0.151781067708 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.019134995453 0.0609392437508 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.38 11.5310837438 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.32 8.32886699507 124% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 55.0591133005 185% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.