Some people think that keeping pets is good for children while others think it is dangerous and unhealthy. Which opinion do you agree with. Discuss both options and give examples.
Surely there has no time in history where the lives of people have changed more dramatically. A quick reflection on the typical day reveals keeping pets has been one of the prominent topics on the contemporary discussion. Some masses think that pet is helpful for children but others assert that it is harmful and unhealthy. I will discuss both the arguments in further paragraphs.
To begin with, keeping pets at home plays an enormous act in human life. Firstly, pets play a role as a friend in children life because pupils can play with it as well as they can feel secure. Moreover, they provide the security of people because their sense of smell is very high so pets can easily catch the thief person eventually they protect the property of human. Furthermore, some dogs are very cute in which small babies spend their time with us so they can enjoy more whereas parents can secure about their children care.
On the other hand, it is dangerous and unhealthy for pupils. Primarily, some breed of pets is very dangerous and they cannot mix with human life. Harmful pets bite the children it is detrimental for children health. Pets bite is very harmful for human health because it spread the fatal disease which is not cureable. Furthermore, some dangerous diseases spread by keeping pets in home.
In conclusion, in my point of view keeping pets at home is beneficial or not for children but it is the responsibility of parents to care about children which type of pets keep into home.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...en which type of pets keep into home.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, so, well, whereas, in conclusion, as well as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.75862068966 17% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1238.0 1207.87684729 102% => OK
No of words: 260.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76153846154 5.00649968141 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49927800225 2.71678728327 92% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55 0.580463131201 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 384.3 379.143842365 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6266202112 50.4703680194 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.4285714286 104.977214359 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5714285714 20.9669160288 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.25397266985 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302864693982 0.242375264174 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117554429222 0.0925447433944 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0717946752908 0.071462118173 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193907111519 0.151781067708 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0567740658941 0.0609392437508 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 12.6369458128 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.1260098522 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.9458128079 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.5310837438 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.32886699507 89% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 55.0591133005 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.94827586207 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.