Some people think law changes human behaviour. Do you agree or disagree?
The importance of law, which has always been debated, has now become more controversial. Law is the main key which keep this society safe. It can be agreed that law changes human behaviour but some people has adopted an opposing view. This essay will elaborate both sides of human behaviour and lead to logical conclusion.
Firstly, there are numerous reasons why law changes human behaviour but most conspicuous one steam that everyone has to follow traffic rules. Traffic rules, tax rules, and crime laws are mainly considerable laws which might change people's behaviour. For example, there was a traffic rules changed during Commonwealth game in Australia. People didn't like at the first time when they were introduced but letter on everyone had follow them. Thus, it proved the point of changes in human behaviour because of law.
On the contrary, some people have adopted an opposing view which means law never be able to change human's behaviour. This side of argument could proved by giving example of Indian traffic laws which are always hard to obey. For instance, seventy percent of people don't follow laws in India apart from criminal laws such as killing some one, robbery, kidnapping, stealing, cheating, and take over someone else property. Thus, it's depend on country and its people to obey the laws and change their behaviour.
From what has been discussed above, it can be concluded that law changes human behaviour regardless of situation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 274, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'traffic'.
Suggestion: traffic
...oples behaviour. For example, there was a traffic rules changed during Commonwealth game ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 344, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
... Commonwealth game in Australia. People didnt like at the first time when they were i...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 426, Rule ID: HAD_VBP[1]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'followed'.
Suggestion: followed
...e introduced but letter on everyone had follow them. Thus, it proved the point of chan...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 426, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'followed'.
Suggestion: followed
...e introduced but letter on everyone had follow them. Thus, it proved the point of chan...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 146, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'prove'
Suggestion: prove
... behaviour. This side of argument could proved by giving example of Indian traffic law...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 265, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...For instance, seventy percent of people dont follow laws in India apart from crimina...
^^^^
Line 5, column 332, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'someone'?
Suggestion: someone
...part from criminal laws such as killing some one, robbery, kidnapping, stealing, cheatin...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, so, thus, apart from, as to, for example, for instance, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1226.0 1207.87684729 102% => OK
No of words: 240.0 242.827586207 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10833333333 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42485681135 2.71678728327 89% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6125 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 376.2 379.143842365 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.8282481645 50.4703680194 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.5714285714 104.977214359 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1428571429 20.9669160288 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.21428571429 7.25397266985 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.33497536946 131% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 2.91625615764 240% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.402870455533 0.242375264174 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.16076054206 0.0925447433944 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109968450638 0.071462118173 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.266194516402 0.151781067708 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0424187587891 0.0609392437508 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 12.6369458128 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.1260098522 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.9458128079 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 11.5310837438 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.32886699507 97% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 55.0591133005 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.94827586207 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 58.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.