Some people think that more money should be spent on protecting endangered species while others think it is a waste of valuable money What is your opinion

Essay topics:

Some people think that more money should be spent on protecting endangered species while others think it is a waste of valuable money.

What is your opinion?

Since the beginning of the 21st century, a lot of animals are exposed to the extinction. Some people believe that more money shoud be spent to protect the endangered species from the extinction, while others argue that there are others issues more important than these animals, and the money should be spent on them, such as helping people who are suffering from wars. This essay will discuss the reason why money should be spent on these endangered species regardless the importance of other issues. Money should be spent on the endangered species because these animals are very important to balance the ecosystem.

The damage of the ecosystem will affect significantly on humans lives in the future. Recent research, which was conducted in the Washington University, has shown that killing the endangered species will cause the disappearing of humans lives in the near future, and it recommends to fund the projects which are responsible on protecting these species. Therefore, it seems clear that money should be spent on protecting endangered species to maintain the balance in the ecosystem.

On the other hand, some people think that money should be spent on other issues, such helping people who are suffering from wars. Some people do not have anything to eat, and these people have the priority than the endangered species. For example, more than one million people die every year because of wars. But, these people are unaware of the fact that the extinction of endangered species could affect our world also, and it is impact is greater than wars. Thus, mony should be spent to help endangered species from extinction regardless the impacts of wars.

In conclusion, this essay discussed the reason why money should be paid to the organizations who follow endangered species since it is important to balace the ecosystem. In my opinion, I believe that the endangered animals should be protected from the extinction.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (47 votes)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 10.5418719212 190% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 6.10837438424 196% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1621.0 1207.87684729 134% => OK
No of words: 316.0 242.827586207 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12974683544 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 3.92707691288 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60154107078 2.71678728327 96% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 139.433497537 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.424050632911 0.580463131201 73% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 500.4 379.143842365 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.931034482759 430% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.1644237665 50.4703680194 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.785714286 104.977214359 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5714285714 20.9669160288 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.25397266985 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 2.75862068966 290% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.457636835101 0.242375264174 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.17594953059 0.0925447433944 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128504383185 0.071462118173 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.285563846639 0.151781067708 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0915414817864 0.0609392437508 150% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 12.6369458128 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.1260098522 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 11.5310837438 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.32886699507 90% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 55.0591133005 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.94827586207 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 58.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.