Some people think that younger employees often have more skills, knowledge and motivation than the old employees. To what extent do you agree with it? Use your experience.
Recently, the phenomenon of n has sparked a heated debate. Some people believe that younger employees often have more skills, knowledge and motivation than the old employees, while others hold the view that the old employees have more skills and knowledge. In my opinion, the younger generations have more knowledge and skill due to social and scientific reasons.
From a social standpoint, a relationship between younger employees and the old employees can provide the society with some noticeable effects rooted in the fact that the merits of skillful employees, as well as experienced employees, are inextricably bound up. According to my experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experience that discovered motivating young people. Thus, beneficial ramifications of the strength of younger generations apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, a correlation between younger employees and old employees might increase the consequences of gaining more knowledge. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of assessing better employees could be related to the demerits of employees' personalities. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of academic knowledge is correlated negatively with companies policy. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of disability of the old employees.
In conclusion, I hold the view that younger employees often have more skills, knowledge and motivation than the old employees. To address this issue, the government and society should make a concerted effort to find solutions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-06 | Arshdeepbatth | 85 | view |
| 2019-10-16 | faronlibenet | 80 | view |
| 2019-10-14 | Alireza.r.68 | 80 | view |
| 2019-06-24 | Ahmed145 | 77 | view |
| 2019-06-24 | Ahmed145 | 80 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, in conclusion, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.5418719212 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 20.9802955665 62% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1397.0 1207.87684729 116% => OK
No of words: 246.0 242.827586207 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.67886178862 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16518171764 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 139.433497537 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544715447154 0.580463131201 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 424.8 379.143842365 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 1.56157635468 384% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.4179017018 50.4703680194 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.416666667 104.977214359 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 20.9669160288 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.25397266985 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.416792308559 0.242375264174 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143261538158 0.0925447433944 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.153680923737 0.071462118173 215% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.266153611332 0.151781067708 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0907365659008 0.0609392437508 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.1260098522 80% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.66 11.5310837438 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.32886699507 112% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 55.0591133005 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.