Some people work for long hours and hard to achieve success and some give importance to free time for them. Give your opinion and discuss your views.
Recently, the phenomenon of hard and long-hours working and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matters of achieving success are highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to conceive that free time can be a plus, and I will investigate that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, long-hours working can provide the society with noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that merits, as well as the advantages of hard-working people, are visible. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the importance of spare time. Thus, beneficial ramifications of achieving aspirations are remarkable.
From a scientific point of view, hard working can supply the community with negative impacts, which are associated with the reality that the demerits of inefficient working are crucial. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by an elite university described irresponsible people. Hence, predicted outcomes of free time are critical.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of hard and long-hours working far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of achieving success prove the significance of important time, but also pinpoint possible implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-02-02 | honorrr | 85 | view |
| 2021-01-29 | honorrr | 55 | view |
| 2021-01-29 | honorrr | 77 | view |
| 2020-07-09 | Alireza.r.m | 80 | view |
| 2020-02-29 | Alireza.r.m | 77 | view |
- What are the different methods students using to achieve information Online materials asking teachers or discussing with classmates 88
- Should individual limit the use of car and use alternative things instead to protect environment 85
- Experience is a more effective way to teach compared to books Agree or disagree 88
- Xenophobia has accelerated rapidly in the Western countries According to you what solutions can be proposed by the government and individuals 49
- While artificial intelligence becomes so advanced people can use computers to translate foreign languages Do you agree with it Use examples or your experiences 82
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1243.0 1207.87684729 103% => OK
No of words: 219.0 242.827586207 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.67579908676 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21804766577 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 139.433497537 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.643835616438 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 394.2 379.143842365 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.190663035 50.4703680194 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.0 104.977214359 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9090909091 20.9669160288 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233110312605 0.242375264174 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.077723577126 0.0925447433944 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0276786771024 0.071462118173 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133613347751 0.151781067708 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0110230215652 0.0609392437508 18% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 12.6369458128 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 53.1260098522 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.66 11.5310837438 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.56 8.32886699507 127% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 55.0591133005 151% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.