Some students choose university near where they live and continue to stay at home with families, other students choose university away from family, what is the advantages and disadvantages for both sides.
Recently, the phenomenon of "some students choose universities near where they live and continue to stay at home with families, other students choose universities away from their family" and its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debating the proposition that universities away from the home town might be remarkably fruitful, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a remarkable number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that selecting universities near the family can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the psychology standpoint, choosing universities near where students live can provide the society with profound effects, which might stem from the fact that supporting students by families and close relationships are inextricably bound up. Regarding my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the role of families in the university selection. Thus, invaluable ramifications of both the student's self-esteem and the emotional support by parents distinctly can be observed.
Within the realm of economics science, without the slightest doubt, choosing universities away from the student's family might exacerbate the already catastrophic consequences of expenses. Moreover, fundamental aspects of living in dorms can relate to the reality that the demerits of far away universities can pertain to the lack of funding. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that if the downsides of renting houses by students were correlated positively with supporting by universities, the local authorities would ultimately address building new campuses. Hence, it's reasonable to infer the preconceived notion of universities.
To conclude, despite several compelling arguments on both sides, I opt to support the idea that the merits of universities near to where students live far outweigh its downsides.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-07-29 | sattar_iust | 88 | view |
| 2019-02-15 | mojtaba1980 | 93 | view |
- Some people think that a sense of competition in children should be encouraged Others believe that children who are taught to cooperate rather than compete become more useful adults Discuss both these views and give your own opinions 84
- Computer and online games should be banned to students in schools as they have no educational value What s your opinion 85
- The chart below shows the amount of spent on six consumer goods in four European countries Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- A good listener is better than a good talker in a social situation Do you agree or disagree 80
- The first chart bellow shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compar 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 239, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nd its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 105, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...bt, choosing universities away from the students family might exacerbate the already cat...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 5.94088669951 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 31.9359605911 147% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1747.0 1207.87684729 145% => OK
No of words: 300.0 242.827586207 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.82333333333 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27460769491 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 139.433497537 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596666666667 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 553.5 379.143842365 146% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.7932412511 50.4703680194 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 158.818181818 104.977214359 151% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2727272727 20.9669160288 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45454545455 7.25397266985 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.519790479702 0.242375264174 214% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.18089365299 0.0925447433944 195% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.140440096825 0.071462118173 197% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.308246608405 0.151781067708 203% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108218390008 0.0609392437508 178% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.6 12.6369458128 155% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.15 53.1260098522 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.9458128079 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.77 11.5310837438 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.45 8.32886699507 125% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 55.0591133005 189% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.