Some universities deduct marks from students' works if given in late, what are your views and what action will you recommend to take?
Recently, deducting marks from students’ works if given in late has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question “would it be beneficial?”. Whereas it is a widely held view that it may have some bad effects, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the educational standpoint, deducting marks are bound up inextricably with university regulations, which indicates they lead to both being on-time and self-discipline. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrates the relationship between environmental factors and a stressful lifestyle as well as an exponential increase in fundamental issues. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of harmful impacts is correlated positively with not only forming a social attitude but also curriculum policy reform.
Within the realm of university and college, without the slightest doubt, tackling negative consequences of strict law attribute to being flexible, in that it would come down to productivity, natural aptitude, and efficiency. A salient example of such attribution is a hidden agenda, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take a feasible solution for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint the current system problems. Besides, this criterion is an indispensable part of the modern lifestyle. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of education and surveillance.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes “all’s well that ends well,” after analyzing what elaborated above, I entirely agree that there are some reasons to support the idea of the ineffectiveness of deducting students’ marks. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, hence, however, if, may, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1675.0 1207.87684729 139% => OK
No of words: 298.0 242.827586207 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.62080536913 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30743981745 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 139.433497537 146% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.684563758389 0.580463131201 118% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 379.143842365 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.2854900782 50.4703680194 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.846153846 104.977214359 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9230769231 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.84615384615 7.25397266985 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183557518674 0.242375264174 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0459077636499 0.0925447433944 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0662681437525 0.071462118173 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103307829453 0.151781067708 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0793541308703 0.0609392437508 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 11.5310837438 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.82 8.32886699507 130% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 55.0591133005 209% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.94827586207 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.