Some universities deduct marks from students' works if given in late, what are your views and what action will you recommend to take?
Recently, mark deduction in regards to be late has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "should universities deduct students' mark, if they are late?". Whereas it is a widely held view that it is highly beneficial, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the educational standpoint, overall scores are bound up inextricably with examination booklet, which indicates they lead to both oral exam and written assignment. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2018 demonstrates the relationship between academic study and course syllabus as well as an exponential increase in student performance. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of academic output is correlated positively with not only mental ability but also teaching method.
Within the realm of psychology, without the slightest doubt, grade decreasing attribute to student task, in that it would come down to stress, anxiety, and depression. A salient example of such attribution is motivated student, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take agile mind for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint incorrect assessment problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to traffic, distance, and even rural residence. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of offering better policy and less severe punishment.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that precise recommendation must be taken into consideration to face with this issue. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 26, Rule ID: IN_REGARD_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'regarding' or 'with regard to'.
Suggestion: regarding; with regard to
Recently, mark deduction in regards to be late has sparked an ongoing controve...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cts of that throughout this essay. From the educational standpoint, overall...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... ability but also teaching method. Within the realm of psychology, without ...
^^^^^^^
Line 21, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...policy and less severe punishment. To conclude, as for myself, as the sayin...
^^^^^^^
Line 25, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 20.9802955665 119% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.75862068966 243% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1664.0 1207.87684729 138% => OK
No of words: 290.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.73793103448 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13200653299 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 139.433497537 149% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.71724137931 0.580463131201 124% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 379.143842365 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.6346118715 50.4703680194 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.0 104.977214359 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3076923077 20.9669160288 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53846153846 7.25397266985 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138626638315 0.242375264174 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.034027613114 0.0925447433944 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0503548911297 0.071462118173 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0776028763836 0.151781067708 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0702524300055 0.0609392437508 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 12.6369458128 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.31 11.5310837438 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.1 8.32886699507 133% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 55.0591133005 212% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.