Soon retirement of workers can create job opportunities for young people. discuss
Give examples.
Recently, the phenomenon of soon retirement of workers and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matters of creating job opportunities are highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to conceive that young people can be a plus, and I will investigate that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, soon retirement of workers can provide the society with noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that merits, as well as the advantages of young employees, are visible. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the importance of creating suitable jobs. Thus, beneficial ramifications of efficient people are remarkable.
From a scientific point of view, soon retirement can supply the community with negative impacts, which are associated with the reality that the demerits of inexperienced workers are crucial. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by an elite university described old people. Hence, predicted outcomes of an inefficient job opportunity are critical.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of soon retirement of workers far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of created job opportunities prove the significance of young people, but also pinpoint possible implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-06-26 | Alireza.r.m | 88 | view |
| 2020-02-24 | Alireza.r.m | 88 | view |
- Is hosting the Olympic Games bring any benefit to the host countries 88
- What is your idea about lazy journalism that is commonplace in the digitalized world 77
- Effective learning requires time comfort and peace so it is impossible to combine study and employment Study and employment distract one from another To what extent do you think the statements are realistic Support your opinion with examples 85
- Some people work for long hours and hard to achieve success and some give importance to free time for them Give your opinion and discuss your views 80
- Increasing the price of fuels is the best way to solve pollution problems To what extent do you agree or disagree with the above statement 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1280.0 1207.87684729 106% => OK
No of words: 226.0 242.827586207 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.66371681416 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26841128602 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632743362832 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 409.5 379.143842365 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0401621968 50.4703680194 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.363636364 104.977214359 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5454545455 20.9669160288 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348755862301 0.242375264174 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109055714755 0.0925447433944 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.053237036564 0.071462118173 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200531328083 0.151781067708 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0374856807669 0.0609392437508 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 11.5310837438 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.64 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 55.0591133005 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.