The space travel is fantastic these days and people are very fascinated towards it, but there are many environmental problems in our planet that need to be resolved first. What is your opinion? Should money be spent on space travel or on environmental issues?
Recently, the phenomenon of resolving environmental problems of the planet and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matters of spending money on space travel are highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to conceive that fantastic people can be a plus, and I will investigate that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, solving environmental problems can provide the society with noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that merits, as well as the advantages of costly space travel, are visible. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the importance of spending money on environmental issues. Thus, beneficial ramifications of fascinated people are remarkable.
From a scientific point of view, space travel can supply the community with negative impacts, which are associated with the reality that the demerits of the environmental crisis are crucial. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by an elite university described unsolved vital problems of the planet. Hence, predicted outcomes of inefficient resolutions are critical.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of resolving the environmental problems of our planet far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of space travel prove the significance of spending money on environmental issues, but also pinpoint possible implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-07-05 | Alireza.r.m | 80 | view |
| 2020-02-28 | Alireza.r.m | 86 | view |
| 2019-08-30 | Mpaul | 77 | view |
| 2019-08-26 | hemsingh81 | 77 | view |
| 2019-07-12 | mojtaba1980 | 80 | view |
- Some people work for long hours and hard to achieve success and some give importance to free time for them Give your opinion and discuss your views 80
- Experience is a more effective way to teach compared to books Agree or disagree 88
- Is hosting the Olympic Games bring any benefit to the host countries 88
- What are the advantages and disadvantages of being over competitive to individuals and society 70
- The importance of travel seems to be overrated Brilliant scholars locked themselves at home Travel is important for education To what extent to you agree or disagree 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1376.0 1207.87684729 114% => OK
No of words: 240.0 242.827586207 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.73333333333 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27336685319 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6125 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 442.8 379.143842365 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.8788348456 50.4703680194 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.090909091 104.977214359 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8181818182 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.336636652947 0.242375264174 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104690054663 0.0925447433944 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0493667588218 0.071462118173 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193111438736 0.151781067708 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0525597546235 0.0609392437508 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.95 11.5310837438 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.73 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 55.0591133005 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.