The Space travel is fantastic these days and people are more fascinated towards it but there are many environmental problems in our planet that need to be resolved first. What is your opinion? Should money be spent on space travel or on environmetal issues?
There are a great number of people who advocate that allocating budget for space travel research is advantageous, while others hold an opponent view that resolving existing environmental issues on our planet must be tackled first. I am inclined to believe that higher administration should spend money on crucial environmental issues rather than spending enormous amount on space missions. This essay will elucidate both sides and thus will lead to logical conclusion.
First of all, it is agreed that space mining plays a pivotal role in diffusion of information about outer space. This is to say that such information could increase the scientist's determination and etiquette's towards many unanswered questions. Therefore, their enthusiasm will be amplified in a more descriptive way which eventually leads to advent new technologies. For example, successful launch of satellites could give the scientists a vivid picture of current crucial environmental issues such as global warming, so they would be able to take decisive actions to ameliorate the situation.
Nevertheless, there remain some drawbacks which can certainly overwhelm the potential influence and the most alarming one is the enormous amount of money expenditure in space travel. As a matter of fact, only the most developed countries in the world can afford to send missions to space at a cost of trillion dollars. For example, a recent study shows that US has launched 50 trillion dollars of space mission. On the other hand stands a perspective of fulfilling basic necessities of humanity such as food, water and air which are becoming polluted these days and detrimental to environment and society. Thus, it illustrates that extremely expensive space missions are waste of money in front of environmental problems of humanity that need to be resolved first.
In conclusion, the foregoing discussion propounds the view that space programs could bring immense benefits to our lives, but the need of the hour is to resolve the problems of our planet first that should not be ignored.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-07-05 | Alireza.r.m | 80 | view |
| 2020-02-28 | Alireza.r.m | 86 | view |
| 2019-08-30 | Mpaul | 77 | view |
| 2019-08-26 | hemsingh81 | 77 | view |
| 2019-07-12 | mojtaba1980 | 80 | view |
- Effective learning requires time, peace and comfort, so it is impossible to combine study and employment. Study and employment distract one from another. To what extent do you think the statements are realistic. Support your opinion with examples. 88
- Whether experimental learning can work well in formal education? agree or disagree? 85
- The Space travel is fantastic these days and people are more fascinated towards it but there are many environmental problems in our planet that need to be resolved first. What is your opinion? Should money be spent on space travel or on environmetal issue 77
- Whether experimental learning can work well in formal education? Agree or disagree? 85
- Dangerous activities like extreme skiing, bungee jumping etc. and whether you support them or not. 70
Comments
Please provide new score
Please provide new score based the changes made in essay. Long sentences have been shortened now.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 170, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'scientists'' or 'scientist's'?
Suggestion: scientists'; scientist's
...hat such information could increase the scientists determination and etiquettes towards ma...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 488, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
...hand stands a perspective of fulfilling basic necessities of humanity such as food, water and air...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a matter of fact, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 6.10837438424 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 5.94088669951 236% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1746.0 1207.87684729 145% => OK
No of words: 330.0 242.827586207 136% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29090909091 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 3.92707691288 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95114956357 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 139.433497537 143% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606060606061 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 539.1 379.143842365 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.873555164 50.4703680194 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.5 104.977214359 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5 20.9669160288 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.25 7.25397266985 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.384156720393 0.242375264174 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122455499531 0.0925447433944 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0925287475201 0.071462118173 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.222592177999 0.151781067708 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0439400654541 0.0609392437508 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 12.6369458128 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 53.1260098522 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 11.5310837438 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.32886699507 117% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 55.0591133005 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.