Space travel is fantastic these days, but there are many issues – such as
environmental problems – that we should be focusing on. What are your views on the allocation of public funding?
Recently, space travel has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question “is it advantageous or not?”. Whereas it is a widely held view that observing space is highly beneficial, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the social standpoint, environmental problems are bound up inextricably with globalization, which indicates they lead to both climate change and soil degradation. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrates the relationship between state-of-the-art technologies and astronomers as well as an exponential increase in green tax. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of clean water is correlated positively with not only living in other planets but also water resource.
Within the realm of science and technology, without the slightest doubt, the allocation of public funding attribute to governmental budget, in that it would come down to clean water, solar system, and energy resource. A salient example of such attribution is the spacecraft, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take other alternatives for granted. Had there been a paradigm sift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint earth’s problems. Besides, this criterion is an indispensable part of modern lifestyle. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of limited resources.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes “all’s well that ends well”, after analyzing what elaborated above, I am firmly believe that space traveling is beneficial. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-07 | elhamsalimi2010 | 88 | view |
- Can the law change human behavior? 88
- Some people think that children should receive formal training at school on how to be good parents in the future. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? 50
- The law can change human behavior. Do you agree or not? 88
- the law can change human behavior. Do you agree or not? 88
- a competitive environment in school and university bring excellence and need to be encouraged 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 143, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'believed'.
Suggestion: believed
...zing what elaborated above, I am firmly believe that space traveling is beneficial. How...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, hence, however, if, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1562.0 1207.87684729 129% => OK
No of words: 273.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.72161172161 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.35321927196 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 139.433497537 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.70695970696 0.580463131201 122% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 379.143842365 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.0084524475 50.4703680194 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.153846154 104.977214359 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.9669160288 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46153846154 7.25397266985 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111131451897 0.242375264174 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0307112522849 0.0925447433944 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0328208878986 0.071462118173 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0640299924138 0.151781067708 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0346053419915 0.0609392437508 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 11.5310837438 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.98 8.32886699507 132% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 55.0591133005 198% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.94827586207 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.