Students should be banned from computer and online gaming at school as they have no educational values.
Do you agree or disagree? Give examples.
Recently, the phenomenon of the computer and online gaming at schools and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matters of educational values are highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to conceive that agreeing to ban computer games at schools can be a plus, and I will investigate that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, prohibiting computer games at schools can provide the society with noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits, as well as the advantages of hard-working students, are visible. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the importance of educational values. Thus, beneficial ramifications of modern schools are remarkable.
From a scientific point of view, online computer games can supply the community with negative impacts which are associated with the reality that the demerits of irresponsible students are crucial. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by an elite university described inefficient schools. Hence, predicted outcomes of an educational value are crucial.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of prohibiting online computer games at schools far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of educational values prove the significance of a responsible student, but also pinpoint possible implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-02-21 | Alireza.r.m | 85 | view |
| 2019-03-12 | pbdarab | 94 | view |
- Should wealthy nations help poor countries with food and education or is it the responsibility of poor nations to improve their condition 85
- Soon retirement of workers can create job opportunities for young people Discuss Give examples 88
- Nowadays more and more people believed that overburden can help complete higher quality in achievements For example professional teachers coaches believe that this applies to students and athletes on the individual and national level What is your point of 85
- Extreme sports Dangerous activities like skiing bungee jumping rafting diving should be banned Agree or disagree 85
- It is important for children to study a film at school to learn literature To what extent you agree Give example 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1340.0 1207.87684729 111% => OK
No of words: 235.0 242.827586207 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.70212765957 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24294407651 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 139.433497537 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617021276596 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 432.0 379.143842365 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.2326817326 50.4703680194 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.818181818 104.977214359 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3636363636 20.9669160288 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319067515223 0.242375264174 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106732482169 0.0925447433944 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0655469226383 0.071462118173 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182331165348 0.151781067708 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0556354076143 0.0609392437508 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.78 11.5310837438 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.66 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 55.0591133005 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.