Students should spend the same amount of time doing exercises as they allocate to studying Do you agree or disagree with it

Essay topics:

Students should spend the same amount of time doing exercises as they allocate to studying. Do you agree or disagree with it?

Mr. BE2022-10-19
One of the most conspicuous trends in today's world is a colossal upsurge in the number of people to believe that students should spend the same amount of time doing exercise. There is a widespread worry that this will only lead to a myriad of concerns in one's life. However, I do not entirely accept this, and I will explain why in this essay.

There are a large number of arguments in favor of my stance. The most preponderant one is that students should be doing exercise but not the same amount of time as they allocate to studying. Of course, exercise makes students healthy and fit, but excess of everything is bad. Students should spend a limited amount of time doing exercise. Through this body and study, both are not affected. Thanks to the wide range of advantages being offered by students should be spending time doing exercise. It can enhance the productivity, and standard of their life, with much ease, efficacy, and convenience. Needless to say, all these merits stand one in good stead, as far as augmenting their chances of a better life is concerned.

Another pivotal aspect of the aforementioned proposition is that it is only likely to help one thrive and excel in varied areas. Besides, only when one follows such a system, can one broaden their horizons. Thus, learning such essential attributions as dedication and responsibilities. Hence, It is apparent why many are in favor of students doing exercise but not the same amount of time as they allocate to studying.

To conclude, the benefits of the students doing exercise, but not the same amount of time as they allocate to studying are indeed too great to ignore.

Votes
Average: 6.5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 256, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ll only lead to a myriad of concerns in ones life. However, I do not entirely accept...
^^^^
Line 5, column 11, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...explain why in this essay. There are a large number of arguments in favor of my stance. The mo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, hence, however, if, thus, of course

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1386.0 1207.87684729 115% => OK
No of words: 286.0 242.827586207 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84615384615 5.00649968141 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71193463536 2.71678728327 100% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51048951049 0.580463131201 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 438.3 379.143842365 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.931034482759 537% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 12.6551724138 126% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.6161998813 50.4703680194 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.625 104.977214359 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.875 20.9669160288 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0625 7.25397266985 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.441487492435 0.242375264174 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148319547883 0.0925447433944 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.1765916622 0.071462118173 247% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.289748074103 0.151781067708 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0980006500664 0.0609392437508 161% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 12.6369458128 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.1260098522 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.9458128079 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.55 11.5310837438 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.32886699507 94% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 55.0591133005 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 58.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.