study global warming as a subject of climate change
Recently, the phenomenon of climate change and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of bringing greenhouse gases into halt is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the studying of global warming can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, changing the weather patterns can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the getting information about global warming, as well as greenhouse gases, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the influences of acid rain on the marine eco-system. Thus, beneficial ramifications by both emission of toxic gases and rising the atmosphere temperature can be seen.
Within the realm of the destruction of the ozone layer, climate change might increase the consequences of a wide variety of incurable diseases. Moreover, fundamental aspects of the industrialization would relate to this reality that the demerits of fossil fuels pertain to the urbanization. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of melting ice cabs is correlated negatively with a rise in sea levels. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of renewable source of energy.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the drawbacks of climate change far outweigh its benefits. Not only do the advantages of imposing stricter legislation prove the significance of using public transport systems, but also pinpoint using possible implications.
- The study of the century old dramas and plays by pupils in their student career is beneficial for understanding human development 84
- Do you agree with involving employees in decision making process? 77
- Do you think consumer should avoid over packed products or it is the responsibility of producer to avoid extra packaging of products? Give your views or any relevant example. 77
- The use of newspaper will be less important in future. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Explain with reasons and examples. 44
- The environment we live in is in danger. What are the underlying causes? Who is responsible to combat this? 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 324, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o pinpoint using possible implications.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1580.0 1207.87684729 131% => OK
No of words: 286.0 242.827586207 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52447552448 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1971428391 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 139.433497537 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.660839160839 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 379.143842365 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8111477442 50.4703680194 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.666666667 104.977214359 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8333333333 20.9669160288 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41666666667 7.25397266985 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194266530982 0.242375264174 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0569433450906 0.0925447433944 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0717392412639 0.071462118173 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100792498419 0.151781067708 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0615235176831 0.0609392437508 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 11.5310837438 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.96 8.32886699507 132% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 55.0591133005 203% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.