For a successful company, selling products depends more on company's reputation or it depends more on if they provide discount and free offers. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of selling a product by companies and its profound impact has become a long-running dispute. Although it is a widespread belief that companies' reputation is intrinsically rewarding, a fair number of academic researchers view buyers from their theoretical perspective. I am inclined to believe that each business should carefully weigh up the pros and cons of the importance of company's reputation or free offers.
From a socioeconomic standpoint, lower prices are intimately bound up with big sales, which these might be the deciding factor in both having potential buyers and brand recognition. For example, a prestigious university undertook a comprehensive study to demonstrate the nature of the relationship between customer value and business strategy as well as gaining market share. Therefore, the conclusive evidence presented thus far support the contention that convincing people to purchase correlates positively with not only customer service but also free offers.
In financial terms, a competitive labor market is undoubtedly attributable to any business model, in that it would lead to making a profit, economic prosperity, and increasing market shares. According to my hands-on experience, a vivid illustration of such attributions is trustworthy companies, which is an underlying cause for concern since the business leaders have overlooked in taking potential buyers for granted. Had they contemplated market segment in advance, it might have had ample opportunity to preserve relationships with buyers. Thus, the excellent customer service could play a dominant role in making more profits.
To recapitulate, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I firmly believe that the advantages of company's reputation are of more significance. However, authorities are recommended to amend existing legislation to minimize undesirable side effects of providing discounts and free offers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-03 | khaledayasmin | 80 | view |
| 2019-04-25 | Paulo87 | 70 | view |
| 2019-01-16 | lalacamargo1 | 77 | view |
| 2018-07-14 | Rajnidevi | 80 | view |
| 2018-07-13 | SB83 | 75 | view |
- Global Warming 89
- For a successful company, selling products depends more on company's reputation or it depends more on if they provide discount and free offers. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 85
- The ability to learn more than one language will be less important in the future. Do you agree or disagree? 88
- For a successful company, selling products depends more on company's reputation or it depends more on if they provide discount and free offers. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 80
- For a successful company, selling products depends more on company's reputation or it depends more on if they provide discount and free offers. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 95, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nies and its profound impact has become a long-running dispute. Although it is a widespread be...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1660.0 1207.87684729 137% => OK
No of words: 286.0 242.827586207 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.8041958042 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25305635769 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 139.433497537 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.664335664336 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 532.8 379.143842365 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 1.56157635468 448% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.6570784257 50.4703680194 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.333333333 104.977214359 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8333333333 20.9669160288 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 7.25397266985 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16642992875 0.242375264174 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.056453570726 0.0925447433944 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0411425606613 0.071462118173 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101568302053 0.151781067708 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0567574910734 0.0609392437508 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 12.6369458128 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 22.75 53.1260098522 43% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.9458128079 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.66 11.5310837438 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.68 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 55.0591133005 194% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.